A Neural Scaling Law from Lottery Ticket Ensembling
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Neural scaling laws (NSL) refer to the phenomenon where model performance improves with scale. Sharma & Kaplan analyzed NSL using approximation theory and predict that MSE losses decay as N-α, α=4/d, where N is the number of model parameters, and d is the intrinsic input dimension. Although their theory works well for some cases (e.g., ReLU networks), we surprisingly find that a simple 1D problem y=x2 manifests a different scaling law (α=1) from their predictions (α=4). We opened the neural networks and found that the new scaling law originates from lottery ticket ensembling: a wider network on average has more "lottery tickets", which are ensembled to reduce the variance of outputs. We support the ensembling mechanism by mechanistically interpreting single neural networks, as well as studying them statistically. We attribute the N-1 scaling law to the "central limit theorem" of lottery tickets. Finally, we discuss its potential implications for large language models and statistical physics-type theories of learning.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 22 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Oct 2023.
Builds on
19 of 22 references.
References · 19
- 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,411
- 2022Training Compute-Optimal Large Language Modelscited by 2,927
- 2022Emergent Abilities of Large Language Modelscited by 2,483
- 2018The Lottery Ticket Hypothesis: Finding Sparse, Trainable Neural Networkscited by 2,250
- 2021Scaling Vision Transformerscited by 993
- 2017Deep Learning Scaling is Predictable, Empiricallycited by 556
- 2023Are Emergent Abilities of Large Language Models a Mirage?cited by 515
- 2020Scaling Laws for Autoregressive Generative Modelingcited by 510
- 2019A Constructive Prediction of the Generalization Error Across Scalescited by 202
- 2021The Principles of Deep Learning Theorycited by 169
- 2023The Clock and the Pizza: Two Stories in Mechanistic Explanation of Neural Networkscited by 153
- 2023The Hydra Effect: Emergent Self-repair in Language Model Computationscited by 145
7 more
- 2023The Quantization Model of Neural Scalingcited by 137
- 2020Neural Networks and Quantum Field Theorycited by 58
- 2020A Neural Scaling Law from the Dimension of the Data Manifoldcited by 48
- 2023Seeing is Believing: Brain-Inspired Modular Training for Mechanistic Interpretabilitycited by 38
- 2020On Power Laws in Deep Ensemblescited by 26
- 2022Precision Machine Learningcited by 14
- 2021Redundant representations help generalization in wide neural networkscited by 9
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 4; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.
5 papers.
- 2024Mechanistic Interpretability for AI Safety -- A Reviewcited by 415
- 2024gzip Predicts Data-dependent Scaling Lawscited by 14
- 2024A Resource Model For Neural Scaling Lawcited by 8
- 2024How Do Transformers "Do" Physics? Investigating the Simple Harmonic Oscillatorcited by 4
- 2026Symmetry without a manifold: intrinsic dimension on orbitscited by 0
- 2026Symmetry without a manifold: intrinsic dimension on orbits15 Sep 2026
- 2024gzip Predicts Data-dependent Scaling Laws26 May 2024
- 2024How Do Transformers "Do" Physics? Investigating the Simple Harmonic Oscillator23 May 2024
- 2024Mechanistic Interpretability for AI Safety -- A Review22 Apr 2024
- 2024A Resource Model For Neural Scaling Law7 Feb 2024