An evaluation of pre-trained models for feature extraction in image classification
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In recent years, we have witnessed a considerable increase in performance in image classification tasks. This performance improvement is mainly due to the adoption of deep learning techniques. Generally, deep learning techniques demand a large set of annotated data, making it a challenge when applying it to small datasets. In this scenario, transfer learning strategies have become a promising alternative to overcome these issues. This work aims to compare the performance of different pre-trained neural networks for feature extraction in image classification tasks. We evaluated 16 different pre-trained models in four image datasets. Our results demonstrate that the best general performance along the datasets was achieved by CLIP-ViT-B and ViT-H-14, where the CLIP-ResNet50 model had similar performance but with less variability. Therefore, our study provides evidence supporting the choice of models for feature extraction in image classification tasks.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Oct 2023.
Builds on
20 of 44 references.
References · 20
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
- 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,267
- 2016Densely Connected Convolutional Networkscited by 6,691
- 2015Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Visioncited by 5,451
- 2014Going Deeper with Convolutionscited by 4,231
- 2022A ConvNet for the 2020scited by 3,545
- 2016Wide Residual Networkscited by 3,057
- 2016Aggregated Residual Transformations for Deep Neural Networkscited by 2,540
- 2019Searching for MobileNetV3cited by 1,984
- 2018ShuffleNet V2: Practical Guidelines for Efficient CNN Architecture Designcited by 1,132
8 more
- 2016SqueezeNet: AlexNet-level accuracy with 50x fewer parameters and <0.5MB model sizecited by 1,054
- 2020Designing Network Design Spacescited by 954
- 2018MnasNet: Platform-Aware Neural Architecture Search for Mobilecited by 937
- 2014One weird trick for parallelizing convolutional neural networkscited by 264
- 2020General Multi-label Image Classification with Transformerscited by 126
- 2018Transfer learning for time series classificationcited by 60
- 2017Machine Learning for the Geosciences: Challenges and Opportunitiescited by 53
- 2017Convolutional Neural Networks for Histopathology Image Classification: Training vs. Using Pre-Trained Networkscited by 10
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 1.
2 papers.