mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

An evaluation of pre-trained models for feature extraction in image classification

arXiv 2310.02037 ↗First posted 3 Oct 2023cs.CV cs.AIcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In recent years, we have witnessed a considerable increase in performance in image classification tasks. This performance improvement is mainly due to the adoption of deep learning techniques. Generally, deep learning techniques demand a large set of annotated data, making it a challenge when applying it to small datasets. In this scenario, transfer learning strategies have become a promising alternative to overcome these issues. This work aims to compare the performance of different pre-trained neural networks for feature extraction in image classification tasks. We evaluated 16 different pre-trained models in four image datasets. Our results demonstrate that the best general performance along the datasets was achieved by CLIP-ViT-B and ViT-H-14, where the CLIP-ResNet50 model had similar performance but with less variability. Therefore, our study provides evidence supporting the choice of models for feature extraction in image classification tasks.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Oct 2023.

Builds on

20 of 44 references.

References · 20

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
  3. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
  4. 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,267
  5. 2016Densely Connected Convolutional Networkscited by 6,691
  6. 2015Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Visioncited by 5,451
  7. 2014Going Deeper with Convolutionscited by 4,231
  8. 2022A ConvNet for the 2020scited by 3,545
  9. 2016Wide Residual Networkscited by 3,057
  10. 2016Aggregated Residual Transformations for Deep Neural Networkscited by 2,540
  11. 2019Searching for MobileNetV3cited by 1,984
  12. 2018ShuffleNet V2: Practical Guidelines for Efficient CNN Architecture Designcited by 1,132
8 more
  1. 2016SqueezeNet: AlexNet-level accuracy with 50x fewer parameters and <0.5MB model sizecited by 1,054
  2. 2020Designing Network Design Spacescited by 954
  3. 2018MnasNet: Platform-Aware Neural Architecture Search for Mobilecited by 937
  4. 2014One weird trick for parallelizing convolutional neural networkscited by 264
  5. 2020General Multi-label Image Classification with Transformerscited by 126
  6. 2018Transfer learning for time series classificationcited by 60
  7. 2017Machine Learning for the Geosciences: Challenges and Opportunitiescited by 53
  8. 2017Convolutional Neural Networks for Histopathology Image Classification: Training vs. Using Pre-Trained Networkscited by 10

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 1.

2 papers.