mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Randomized Dimension Reduction with Statistical Guarantees

arXiv 2310.01739 ↗First posted 3 Oct 2023cs.LG cs.NA math.NAcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Large models and enormous data are essential driving forces of the unprecedented successes achieved by modern algorithms, especially in scientific computing and machine learning. Nevertheless, the growing dimensionality and model complexity, as well as the non-negligible workload of data pre-processing, also bring formidable costs to such successes in both computation and data aggregation. As the deceleration of Moore's Law slackens the cost reduction of computation from the hardware level, fast heuristics for expensive classical routines and efficient algorithms for exploiting limited data are increasingly indispensable for pushing the limit of algorithm potency. This thesis explores some of such algorithms for fast execution and efficient data utilization. From the computational efficiency perspective, we design and analyze fast randomized low-rank decomposition algorithms for large matrices based on "matrix sketching", which can be regarded as a dimension reduction strategy in the data space. These include the randomized pivoting-based interpolative and CUR decomposition discussed in Chapter 2 and the randomized subspace approximations discussed in Chapter 3. From the sample efficiency perspective, we focus on learning algorithms with various incorporations of data augmentation that improve generalization and distributional robustness provably. Specifically, Chapter 4 presents a sample complexity analysis for data augmentation consistency regularization where we view sample efficiency from the lens of dimension reduction in the function space. Then in Chapter 5, we introduce an adaptively weighted data augmentation consistency regularization algorithm for distributionally robust optimization with applications in medical image segmentation.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 46 of its 183 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Oct 2023.

Builds on

46 of 183 references.

References · 46

  1. 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,267
  2. 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 11,979
  3. 2017mixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 5,155
  4. 2016Wide Residual Networkscited by 3,057
  5. 2020FixMatch: Simplifying Semi-Supervised Learning with Consistency and Confidencecited by 2,080
  6. 2017Improved Regularization of Convolutional Neural Networks with Cutoutcited by 1,623
  7. 2021TransUNet: Transformers Make Strong Encoders for Medical Image Segmentationcited by 1,552
  8. 2019MixMatch: A Holistic Approach to Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 1,390
  9. 2019Distributionally Robust Neural Networks for Group Shifts: On the Importance of Regularization for Worst-Case Generalizationcited by 1,232
  10. 2021Swin-Unet: Unet-like Pure Transformer for Medical Image Segmentationcited by 1,218
  11. 2016Temporal Ensembling for Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 1,054
  12. 2015Improving Neural Machine Translation Models with Monolingual Datacited by 784
34 more
  1. 2016Regularization With Stochastic Transformations and Perturbations for Deep Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 441
  2. 2018Learning Models with Uniform Performance via Distributionally Robust Optimizationcited by 334
  3. 2018Not All Samples Are Created Equal: Deep Learning with Importance Samplingcited by 323
  4. 2021Provable Guarantees for Self-Supervised Deep Learning with Spectral Contrastive Losscited by 311
  5. 2021Self-Supervised Learning with Data Augmentations Provably Isolates Content from Stylecited by 308
  6. 2019On The Power of Curriculum Learning in Training Deep Networkscited by 285
  7. 2016Statistics of Robust Optimization: A Generalized Empirical Likelihood Approachcited by 182
  8. 2015Online Batch Selection for Faster Training of Neural Networkscited by 121
  9. 2021Toward Understanding the Feature Learning Process of Self-supervised Contrastive Learningcited by 119
  10. 2019Deep Scale-spaces: Equivariance Over Scalecited by 113
  11. 2019Scale-Equivariant Steerable Networkscited by 110
  12. 2018A Kernel Theory of Modern Data Augmentationcited by 106
  13. 2021AdaMatch: A Unified Approach to Semi-Supervised Learning and Domain Adaptationcited by 104
  14. 2021Learning with invariances in random features and kernel modelscited by 89
  15. 2015Variance Reduction in SGD by Distributed Importance Samplingcited by 79
  16. 2019Enhanced Convolutional Neural Tangent Kernelscited by 76
  17. 2020Learning Invariances in Neural Networkscited by 52
  18. 2020On the Generalization Effects of Linear Transformations in Data Augmentationcited by 47
  19. 2019Data Augmentation Revisited: Rethinking the Distribution Gap between Clean and Augmented Datacited by 33
  20. 2022Sample Efficiency of Data Augmentation Consistency Regularizationcited by 28
  21. 2020Choosing the Sample with Lowest Loss makes SGD Robustcited by 26
  22. 2022A Theory of PAC Learnability under Transformation Invariancescited by 21
  23. 2019Does Data Augmentation Lead to Positive Margin?cited by 18
  24. 2020Functional Regularization for Representation Learning: A Unified Theoretical Perspectivecited by 18
  25. 2022Data Augmentation as Feature Manipulationcited by 18
  26. 2019A Group-Theoretic Framework for Data Augmentationcited by 14
  27. 2021On the Sample Complexity of Learning under Invariance and Geometric Stabilitycited by 13
  28. 2017Self-ensembling for visual domain adaptationcited by 12
  29. 2022An Embarrassingly Simple Consistency Regularization Method for Semi-Supervised Medical Image Segmentationcited by 10
  30. 2018Efficient Augmentation via Data Subsamplingcited by 8
  31. 2023Cluster-aware Semi-supervised Learning: Relational Knowledge Distillation Provably Learns Clusteringcited by 7
  32. 2020Improved guarantees and a multiple-descent curve for Column Subset Selection and the Nystr"om methodcited by 3
  33. 2022Adaptively Weighted Data Augmentation Consistency Regularization for Robust Optimization under Concept Shiftcited by 3
  34. 2020Squared ℓ2 Norm as Consistency Loss for Leveraging Augmented Data to Learn Robust and Invariant Representationscited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.