mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Meta Semantic Template for Evaluation of Large Language Models

arXiv 2310.01448 ↗First posted 1 Oct 2023cs.CL cs.AIcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Do large language models (LLMs) genuinely understand the semantics of the language, or just memorize the training data? The recent concern on potential data contamination of LLMs has raised awareness of the community to conduct research on LLMs evaluation. In this paper, we propose MSTemp, an approach that creates meta semantic templates to evaluate the semantic understanding ability of LLMs. The core of MSTemp is not to perform evaluation directly on existing benchmark datasets, but to generate new out-of-distribution (OOD) evaluation sets using existing datasets as seeds. Specifically, for a given sentence, MSTemp leverages another language model to generate new samples while preserving its semantics. The new samples are called semantic templates to the original sentence. Then, MSTemp generates evaluation samples via sentence parsing and random word replacement on the semantic templates. MSTemp is highly flexible, dynamic, and cost-effective. Our initial experiments show that MSTemp-generated samples can significantly reduce the performance of LLMs using existing datasets as seeds. We hope this initial work can shed light on future research of LLMs evaluation.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Oct 2023.

Builds on

25 of 32 references.

References · 25

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  2. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  3. 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 13,028
  4. 2018GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Natural Language Understandingcited by 4,899
  5. 2021On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Modelscited by 4,033
  6. 2021Finetuned Language Models Are Zero-Shot Learnerscited by 3,780
  7. 2023Sparks of Artificial General Intelligence: Early experiments with GPT-4cited by 2,592
  8. 2022Beyond the Imitation Game: Quantifying and extrapolating the capabilities of language modelscited by 1,998
  9. 2023A Survey on Evaluation of Large Language Modelscited by 1,242
  10. 2022Red Teaming Language Models with Language Modelscited by 1,026
  11. 2020Beyond Accuracy: Behavioral Testing of NLP models with CheckListcited by 1,006
  12. 2022Quantifying Memorization Across Neural Language Modelscited by 763
13 more
  1. 2021BBQ: A Hand-Built Bias Benchmark for Question Answeringcited by 701
  2. 2021Dynabench: Rethinking Benchmarking in NLPcited by 459
  3. 2023The Reversal Curse: LLMs trained on "A is B" fail to learn "B is A"cited by 407
  4. 2023PromptRobust: Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Large Language Models on Adversarial Promptscited by 226
  5. 2023On the Robustness of ChatGPT: An Adversarial and Out-of-distribution Perspectivecited by 211
  6. 2023Causal Parrots: Large Language Models May Talk Causality But Are Not Causalcited by 150
  7. 2023Emergent and Predictable Memorization in Large Language Modelscited by 148
  8. 2021Types of Out-of-Distribution Texts and How to Detect Themcited by 80
  9. 2022GLUE-X: Evaluating Natural Language Understanding Models from an Out-of-distribution Generalization Perspectivecited by 72
  10. 2023Evaluating Language Models for Mathematics through Interactionscited by 70
  11. 2021Dynaboard: An Evaluation-As-A-Service Platform for Holistic Next-Generation Benchmarkingcited by 53
  12. 2023Towards Robust Personalized Dialogue Generation via Order-Insensitive Representation Regularizationcited by 17
  13. 2022Dynatask: A Framework for Creating Dynamic AI Benchmark Taskscited by 16

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2.

2 papers.