Towards reporting bias in visual-language datasets: bimodal augmentation by decoupling object-attribute association
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Reporting bias arises when people assume that some knowledge is universally understood and hence, do not necessitate explicit elaboration. In this paper, we focus on the wide existence of reporting bias in visual-language datasets, embodied as the object-attribute association, which can subsequentially degrade models trained on them. To mitigate this bias, we propose a bimodal augmentation (BiAug) approach through object-attribute decoupling to flexibly synthesize visual-language examples with a rich array of object-attribute pairing and construct cross-modal hard negatives. We employ large language models (LLMs) in conjunction with a grounding object detector to extract target objects. Subsequently, the LLM generates a detailed attribute description for each object and produces a corresponding hard negative counterpart. An inpainting model is then used to create images based on these detailed object descriptions. By doing so, the synthesized examples explicitly complement omitted objects and attributes to learn, and the hard negative pairs steer the model to distinguish object attributes. Our experiments demonstrated that BiAug is superior in object-attribute understanding. In addition, BiAug also improves the performance on zero-shot retrieval tasks on general benchmarks like MSCOCO and Flickr30K. BiAug refines the way of collecting text-image datasets. Mitigating the reporting bias helps models achieve a deeper understanding of visual-language phenomena, expanding beyond mere frequent patterns to encompass the richness and diversity of real-world scenarios.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 25 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Oct 2023.
Builds on
23 of 25 references.
References · 23
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
- 2021High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion Modelscited by 18,694
- 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,498
- 2023BLIP-2: Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training with Frozen Image Encoders and Large Language Modelscited by 6,069
- 2022BLIP: Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training for Unified Vision-Language Understanding and Generationcited by 4,310
- 2022LAION-5B: An open large-scale dataset for training next generation image-text modelscited by 4,131
- 2021Scaling Up Visual and Vision-Language Representation Learning With Noisy Text Supervisioncited by 3,848
- 2023Grounding DINO: Marrying DINO with Grounded Pre-Training for Open-Set Object Detectioncited by 3,274
- 2019Language Models as Knowledge Bases?cited by 1,922
- 2015Microsoft COCO Captions: Data Collection and Evaluation Servercited by 1,447
- 2015Flickr30k Entities: Collecting Region-to-Phrase Correspondences for Richer Image-to-Sentence Modelscited by 1,352
- 2022CoCa: Contrastive Captioners are Image-Text Foundation Modelscited by 1,265
11 more
- 2014Deep Visual-Semantic Alignments for Generating Image Descriptionscited by 966
- 2022When and why vision-language models behave like bags-of-words, and what to do about it?cited by 603
- 2023Synthetic Data from Diffusion Models Improves ImageNet Classificationcited by 326
- 2022Is synthetic data from generative models ready for image recognition?cited by 320
- 2023Improving CLIP Training with Language Rewritescited by 216
- 2023StableRep: Synthetic Images from Text-to-Image Models Make Strong Visual Representation Learnerscited by 177
- 2021Robust Learning Meets Generative Models: Can Proxy Distributions Improve Adversarial Robustness?cited by 113
- 2023Improving Multimodal Datasets with Image Captioningcited by 93
- 2023Filtering, Distillation, and Hard Negatives for Vision-Language Pre-Trainingcited by 91
- 2023Leaving Reality to Imagination: Robust Classification via Generated Datasetscited by 91
- 2022Is a Caption Worth a Thousand Images? A Controlled Study for Representation Learningcited by 39
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 4; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.
7 papers.
- 2024A Survey on Data Augmentation in Large Model Eracited by 31
- 2024Word Alignment as Preference for Machine Translationcited by 14
- 2025Contrastive Visual Data Augmentationcited by 3
- 2024HYDEN: Hyperbolic Density Representations for Medical Images and Reportscited by 2
- 2024ARMADA: Attribute-Based Multimodal Data Augmentationcited by 2
- 2025SynRES: Towards Referring Expression Segmentation in the Wild via Synthetic Datacited by 1
- 2026MLLMCLIP: Feature-Level Distillation of MLLM for Robust Vision-Language Representationscited by 0
- 2026MLLMCLIP: Feature-Level Distillation of MLLM for Robust Vision-Language Representations26 Aug 2026
- 2025SynRES: Towards Referring Expression Segmentation in the Wild via Synthetic Data23 May 2025
- 2025Contrastive Visual Data Augmentation24 Feb 2025
- 2024ARMADA: Attribute-Based Multimodal Data Augmentation19 Aug 2024
- 2024HYDEN: Hyperbolic Density Representations for Medical Images and Reports19 Aug 2024
- 2024Word Alignment as Preference for Machine Translation15 May 2024
- 2024A Survey on Data Augmentation in Large Model Era27 Jan 2024