mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

On the Generalization of Training-based ChatGPT Detection Methods

arXiv 2310.01307 ↗First posted 2 Oct 2023cs.CL cs.AI cs.LGcited by 9

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

ChatGPT is one of the most popular language models which achieve amazing performance on various natural language tasks. Consequently, there is also an urgent need to detect the texts generated ChatGPT from human written. One of the extensively studied methods trains classification models to distinguish both. However, existing studies also demonstrate that the trained models may suffer from distribution shifts (during test), i.e., they are ineffective to predict the generated texts from unseen language tasks or topics. In this work, we aim to have a comprehensive investigation on these methods' generalization behaviors under distribution shift caused by a wide range of factors, including prompts, text lengths, topics, and language tasks. To achieve this goal, we first collect a new dataset with human and ChatGPT texts, and then we conduct extensive studies on the collected dataset. Our studies unveil insightful findings which provide guidance for developing future methodologies or data collection strategies for ChatGPT detection.

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 27 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Oct 2023.

Builds on

16 of 27 references.

References · 16

  1. 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 13,958
  2. 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,266
  3. 2023DetectGPT: Zero-Shot Machine-Generated Text Detection using Probability Curvaturecited by 705
  4. 2023A Watermark for Large Language Modelscited by 667
  5. 2019Release Strategies and the Social Impacts of Language Modelscited by 505
  6. 2019GLTR: Statistical Detection and Visualization of Generated Textcited by 490
  7. 2023How Close is ChatGPT to Human Experts? Comparison Corpus, Evaluation, and Detectioncited by 472
  8. 2021MAUVE: Measuring the Gap Between Neural Text and Human Text using Divergence Frontierscited by 466
  9. 2019Using Pre-Training Can Improve Model Robustness and Uncertaintycited by 373
  10. 2023DNA-GPT: Divergent N-Gram Analysis for Training-Free Detection of GPT-Generated Textcited by 127
  11. 2023M4: Multi-generator, Multi-domain, and Multi-lingual Black-Box Machine-Generated Text Detectioncited by 118
  12. 2023Is ChatGPT the Ultimate Programming Assistant -- How far is it?cited by 72
4 more
  1. 2023Multiscale Positive-Unlabeled Detection of AI-Generated Textscited by 59
  2. 2023GPT-Sentinel: Distinguishing Human and ChatGPT Generated Contentcited by 40
  3. 2023A Preliminary Study of ChatGPT on News Recommendation: Personalization, Provider Fairness, Fake Newscited by 19
  4. 2023Let's have a chat! A Conversation with ChatGPT: Technology, Applications, and Limitationscited by 16

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 4; 2025: 2; 2026: 3.

9 papers.