mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

COMPOSER: Scalable and Robust Modular Policies for Snake Robots

arXiv 2310.00871 ↗First posted 2 Oct 2023cs.RO cs.LGcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Snake robots have showcased remarkable compliance and adaptability in their interaction with environments, mirroring the traits of their natural counterparts. While their hyper-redundant and high-dimensional characteristics add to this adaptability, they also pose great challenges to robot control. Instead of perceiving the hyper-redundancy and flexibility of snake robots as mere challenges, there lies an unexplored potential in leveraging these traits to enhance robustness and generalizability at the control policy level. We seek to develop a control policy that effectively breaks down the high dimensionality of snake robots while harnessing their redundancy. In this work, we consider the snake robot as a modular robot and formulate the control of the snake robot as a cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning (MARL) problem. Each segment of the snake robot functions as an individual agent. Specifically, we incorporate a self-attention mechanism to enhance the cooperative behavior between agents. A high-level imagination policy is proposed to provide additional rewards to guide the low-level control policy. We validate the proposed method COMPOSER with five snake robot tasks, including goal reaching, wall climbing, shape formation, tube crossing, and block pushing. COMPOSER achieves the highest success rate across all tasks when compared to a centralized baseline and four modular policy baselines. Additionally, we show enhanced robustness against module corruption and significantly superior zero-shot generalizability in our proposed method. The videos of this work are available on our project page: https://sites.google.com/view/composer-snake/.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Oct 2023.

Builds on

18 of 42 references.

References · 18

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2015High-Dimensional Continuous Control Using Generalized Advantage Estimationcited by 1,916
  3. 2017Multi-Agent Actor-Critic for Mixed Cooperative-Competitive Environmentscited by 1,519
  4. 2021The Surprising Effectiveness of PPO in Cooperative, Multi-Agent Gamescited by 903
  5. 2020Monotonic Value Function Factorisation for Deep Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 475
  6. 2016Learning Multiagent Communication with Backpropagationcited by 355
  7. 2021Trust Region Policy Optimisation in Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 180
  8. 2022Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning is a Sequence Modeling Problemcited by 153
  9. 2018Learning when to Communicate at Scale in Multiagent Cooperative and Competitive Taskscited by 114
  10. 2020One Policy to Control Them All: Shared Modular Policies for Agent-Agnostic Controlcited by 114
  11. 2018Hardware Conditioned Policies for Multi-Robot Transfer Learningcited by 42
  12. 2021Learning Modular Robot Control Policiescited by 18
6 more
  1. 2022Evolving Modular Soft Robots without Explicit Inter-Module Communication using Local Self-Attentioncited by 8
  2. 2019Distributed Learning of Decentralized Control Policies for Articulated Mobile Robotscited by 3
  3. 2020Directional Compliance in Obstacle-Aided Navigation for Snake Robotscited by 2
  4. 2020Robotic modeling of snake traversing large, smooth obstacles reveals stability benefits of body compliancecited by 1
  5. 2023Mechanical Intelligence Simplifies Control in Terrestrial Limbless Locomotioncited by 1
  6. 2023Reconfigurable Robot Control Using Flexible Coupling Mechanismscited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 2.

4 papers.