mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Subsurface Characterization using Ensemble-based Approaches with Deep Generative Models

arXiv 2310.00839 ↗First posted 2 Oct 2023cs.LG stat.CO stat.MLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Estimating spatially distributed properties such as hydraulic conductivity (K) from available sparse measurements is a great challenge in subsurface characterization. However, the use of inverse modeling is limited for ill-posed, high-dimensional applications due to computational costs and poor prediction accuracy with sparse datasets. In this paper, we combine Wasserstein Generative Adversarial Network with Gradient Penalty (WGAN-GP), a deep generative model that can accurately capture complex subsurface structure, and Ensemble Smoother with Multiple Data Assimilation (ES-MDA), an ensemble-based inversion method, for accurate and accelerated subsurface characterization. WGAN-GP is trained to generate high-dimensional K fields from a low-dimensional latent space and ES-MDA then updates the latent variables by assimilating available measurements. Several subsurface examples are used to evaluate the accuracy and efficiency of the proposed method and the main features of the unknown K fields are characterized accurately with reliable uncertainty quantification. Furthermore, the estimation performance is compared with a widely-used variational, i.e., optimization-based, inversion approach, and the proposed approach outperforms the variational inversion method, especially for the channelized and fractured field examples. We explain such superior performance by visualizing the objective function in the latent space: because of nonlinear and aggressive dimension reduction via generative modeling, the objective function surface becomes extremely complex while the ensemble approximation can smooth out the multi-modal surface during the minimization. This suggests that the ensemble-based approach works well over the variational approach when combined with deep generative models at the cost of forward model runs unless convergence-ensuring modifications are implemented in the variational inversion.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 74 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Oct 2023.

Builds on

17 of 74 references.

References · 17

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
  3. 2021Convex optimizationcited by 2,479
  4. 2017Improved Training of Wasserstein GANscited by 2,223
  5. 2016Least Squares Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 1,000
  6. 2017Generative Adversarial Networks: An Overviewcited by 588
  7. 2016f-GAN: Training Generative Neural Samplers using Variational Divergence Minimizationcited by 504
  8. 2016Revisiting Classifier Two-Sample Testscited by 258
  9. 2017BEGAN: Boundary Equilibrium Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 121
  10. 2016Energy-based Generative Adversarial Networkcited by 119
  11. 2018An empirical study on evaluation metrics of generative adversarial networkscited by 81
  12. 2017Training-image based geostatistical inversion using a spatial generative adversarial neural networkcited by 31
5 more
  1. 2021A framework for data-driven solution and parameter estimation of PDEs using conditional generative adversarial networkscited by 30
  2. 2021Continuous conditional generative adversarial networks for data-driven solutions of poroelasticity with heterogeneous material propertiescited by 9
  3. 2018Discovering state-parameter mappings in subsurface models using generative adversarial networkscited by 7
  4. 2016An iterative local updating ensemble smoother for estimation and uncertainty assessment of hydrologic model parameters with multimodal distributionscited by 4
  5. 2021Variational encoder geostatistical analysis (VEGAS) with an application to large scale riverine bathymetrycited by 3

Built on by

Not cited yet.