Dynamic Interpretability for Model Comparison via Decision Rules
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Explainable AI (XAI) methods have mostly been built to investigate and shed light on single machine learning models and are not designed to capture and explain differences between multiple models effectively. This paper addresses the challenge of understanding and explaining differences between machine learning models, which is crucial for model selection, monitoring and lifecycle management in real-world applications. We propose DeltaXplainer, a model-agnostic method for generating rule-based explanations describing the differences between two binary classifiers. To assess the effectiveness of DeltaXplainer, we conduct experiments on synthetic and real-world datasets, covering various model comparison scenarios involving different types of concept drift.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 22 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Sep 2023.
Builds on
8 of 22 references.
References · 8
- 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
- 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,070
- 2017Explanation in Artificial Intelligence: Insights from the Social Sciencescited by 1,206
- 2019Predictive Multiplicity in Classificationcited by 166
- 2023An Empirical Evaluation of the Rashomon Effect in Explainable Machine Learningcited by 25
- 2023Model Based Explanations of Concept Driftcited by 21
- 2021Understanding Prediction Discrepancies in Machine Learning Classifierscited by 6
- 2018Model change detection with application to machine learningcited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.