mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Beyond Tides and Time: Machine Learning Triumph in Water Quality

arXiv 2309.16951 ↗First posted 29 Sep 2023stat.ML cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Water resources are essential for sustaining human livelihoods and environmental well being. Accurate water quality prediction plays a pivotal role in effective resource management and pollution mitigation. In this study, we assess the effectiveness of five distinct predictive models linear regression, Random Forest, XGBoost, LightGBM, and MLP neural network, in forecasting pH values within the geographical context of Georgia, USA. Notably, LightGBM emerges as the top performing model, achieving the highest average precision. Our analysis underscores the supremacy of tree-based models in addressing regression challenges, while revealing the sensitivity of MLP neural networks to feature scaling. Intriguingly, our findings shed light on a counterintuitive discovery: machine learning models, which do not explicitly account for time dependencies and spatial considerations, outperform spatial temporal models. This unexpected superiority of machine learning models challenges conventional assumptions and highlights their potential for practical applications in water quality prediction. Our research aims to establish a robust predictive pipeline accessible to both data science experts and those without domain specific knowledge. In essence, we present a novel perspective on achieving high prediction accuracy and interpretability in data science methodologies. Through this study, we redefine the boundaries of water quality forecasting, emphasizing the significance of data driven approaches over traditional spatial temporal models. Our findings offer valuable insights into the evolving landscape of water resource management and environmental protection.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 3 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Sep 2023.

Builds on

3 of 34 references.

References · 3

  1. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
  2. 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,166
  3. 2020Adaptive Conditional Distribution Estimation with Bayesian Decision Tree Ensemblescited by 7

Built on by

Not cited yet.