Optimal Nonlinearities Improve Generalization Performance of Random Features
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Random feature model with a nonlinear activation function has been shown to perform asymptotically equivalent to a Gaussian model in terms of training and generalization errors. Analysis of the equivalent model reveals an important yet not fully understood role played by the activation function. To address this issue, we study the "parameters" of the equivalent model to achieve improved generalization performance for a given supervised learning problem. We show that acquired parameters from the Gaussian model enable us to define a set of optimal nonlinearities. We provide two example classes from this set, e.g., second-order polynomial and piecewise linear functions. These functions are optimized to improve generalization performance regardless of the actual form. We experiment with regression and classification problems, including synthetic and real (e.g., CIFAR10) data. Our numerical results validate that the optimized nonlinearities achieve better generalization performance than widely-used nonlinear functions such as ReLU. Furthermore, we illustrate that the proposed nonlinearities also mitigate the so-called double descent phenomenon, which is known as the non-monotonic generalization performance regarding the sample size and the model size.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Sep 2023.
Builds on
19 of 38 references.
References · 19
- 2018Neural Tangent Kernel: Convergence and Generalization in Neural Networkscited by 2,621
- 2015Variational Inference with Normalizing Flowscited by 2,170
- 2016Density estimation using Real NVPcited by 2,042
- 2018Reconciling modern machine learning practice and the bias-variance trade-offcited by 927
- 2019The generalization error of random features regression: Precise asymptotics and double descent curvecited by 413
- 2018To understand deep learning we need to understand kernel learningcited by 187
- 2015On the Equivalence between Kernel Quadrature Rules and Random Feature Expansionscited by 138
- 2018Activation Functions: Comparison of trends in Practice and Research for Deep Learningcited by 130
- 2020Generalisation error in learning with random features and the hidden manifold modelcited by 127
- 2021Learning curves of generic features maps for realistic datasets with a teacher-student modelcited by 126
- 2020The Gaussian equivalence of generative models for learning with shallow neural networkscited by 113
- 2020Optimal Regularization Can Mitigate Double Descentcited by 109
7 more
- 2020Random Features for Kernel Approximation: A Survey on Algorithms, Theory, and Beyondcited by 109
- 2014Learning Activation Functions to Improve Deep Neural Networkscited by 63
- 2016Random Fourier Features for Operator-Valued Kernelscited by 22
- 2017On Data-Dependent Random Features for Improved Generalization in Supervised Learningcited by 4
- 2022Optimal Activation Functions for the Random Features Regression Modelcited by 4
- 2019Random Projection in Neural Episodic Controlcited by 1
- 2020Understanding How Over-Parametrization Leads to Acceleration: A case of learning a single teacher neuroncited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 1.
3 papers.
- 2025Asymptotic Study of In-context Learning with Random Transformers through Equivalent Modelscited by 3
- 2024Input-Label Correlation Governs a Linear-to-Nonlinear Transition in Random Features under Spiked Covariancecited by 2
- 2024Learning Expressive Random Feature Models via Parametrized Activationscited by 1
- 2025Asymptotic Study of In-context Learning with Random Transformers through Equivalent Models18 Sep 2025
- 2024Learning Expressive Random Feature Models via Parametrized Activations29 Nov 2024
- 2024Input-Label Correlation Governs a Linear-to-Nonlinear Transition in Random Features under Spiked Covariance30 Sep 2024