mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

A framework for paired-sample hypothesis testing for high-dimensional data

arXiv 2309.16274 ↗First posted 28 Sep 2023stat.ML cs.LG stat.MEcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The standard paired-sample testing approach in the multidimensional setting applies multiple univariate tests on the individual features, followed by p-value adjustments. Such an approach suffers when the data carry numerous features. A number of studies have shown that classification accuracy can be seen as a proxy for two-sample testing. However, neither theoretical foundations nor practical recipes have been proposed so far on how this strategy could be extended to multidimensional paired-sample testing. In this work, we put forward the idea that scoring functions can be produced by the decision rules defined by the perpendicular bisecting hyperplanes of the line segments connecting each pair of instances. Then, the optimal scoring function can be obtained by the pseudomedian of those rules, which we estimate by extending naturally the Hodges-Lehmann estimator. We accordingly propose a framework of a two-step testing procedure. First, we estimate the bisecting hyperplanes for each pair of instances and an aggregated rule derived through the Hodges-Lehmann estimator. The paired samples are scored by this aggregated rule to produce a unidimensional representation. Second, we perform a Wilcoxon signed-rank test on the obtained representation. Our experiments indicate that our approach has substantial performance gains in testing accuracy compared to the traditional multivariate and multiple testing, while at the same time estimates each feature's contribution to the final result.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 4 of its 26 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Sep 2023.

Builds on

4 of 26 references.

References · 4

  1. 2016Revisiting Classifier Two-Sample Testscited by 268
  2. 2016Classification accuracy as a proxy for two sample testingcited by 42
  3. 2019On the Use of Random Forest for Two-Sample Testingcited by 13
  4. 2016Better-Than-Chance Classification for Signal Detectioncited by 8

Built on by

Not cited yet.