Automatic Feature Fairness in Recommendation via Adversaries
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Fairness is a widely discussed topic in recommender systems, but its practical implementation faces challenges in defining sensitive features while maintaining recommendation accuracy. We propose feature fairness as the foundation to achieve equitable treatment across diverse groups defined by various feature combinations. This improves overall accuracy through balanced feature generalizability. We introduce unbiased feature learning through adversarial training, using adversarial perturbation to enhance feature representation. The adversaries improve model generalization for under-represented features. We adapt adversaries automatically based on two forms of feature biases: frequency and combination variety of feature values. This allows us to dynamically adjust perturbation strengths and adversarial training weights. Stronger perturbations are applied to feature values with fewer combination varieties to improve generalization, while higher weights for low-frequency features address training imbalances. We leverage the Adaptive Adversarial perturbation based on the widely-applied Factorization Machine (AAFM) as our backbone model. In experiments, AAFM surpasses strong baselines in both fairness and accuracy measures. AAFM excels in providing item- and user-fairness for single- and multi-feature tasks, showcasing their versatility and scalability. To maintain good accuracy, we find that adversarial perturbation must be well-managed: during training, perturbations should not overly persist and their strengths should decay.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 28 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Sep 2023.
Builds on
28 of 42 references.
References · 28
- 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,364
- 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,415
- 2016Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networkscited by 2,998
- 2017DeepFM: A Factorization-Machine based Neural Network for CTR Predictioncited by 676
- 2018Fairness of Exposure in Rankingscited by 190
- 2017Neural Factorization Machines for Sparse Predictive Analyticscited by 183
- 2021Are Graph Augmentations Necessary? Simple Graph Contrastive Learning for Recommendationcited by 173
- 2019Fairness-Aware Ranking in Search & Recommendation Systems with Application to LinkedIn Talent Searchcited by 138
- 2020To be Robust or to be Fair: Towards Fairness in Adversarial Trainingcited by 137
- 2019Fairness in Recommendation Ranking through Pairwise Comparisonscited by 127
- 2021Causal Intervention for Leveraging Popularity Bias in Recommendationcited by 116
- 2020Model-Agnostic Counterfactual Reasoning for Eliminating Popularity Bias in Recommender Systemcited by 94
16 more
- 2017Causal Embeddings for Recommendationcited by 79
- 2019Unbiased Recommender Learning from Missing-Not-At-Random Implicit Feedbackcited by 79
- 2021User-oriented Fairness in Recommendationcited by 75
- 2018Unbiased Learning to Rank with Unbiased Propensity Estimationcited by 61
- 2021Deconfounded Recommendation for Alleviating Bias Amplificationcited by 51
- 2018Adversarial Personalized Ranking for Recommendationcited by 49
- 2020FairRec: Fairness-aware News Recommendation with Decomposed Adversarial Learningcited by 44
- 2018Outer Product-based Neural Collaborative Filteringcited by 41
- 2021Personalized Counterfactual Fairness in Recommendationcited by 38
- 2020The Connection Between Popularity Bias, Calibration, and Fairness in Recommendationcited by 35
- 2019Privacy-Aware Recommendation with Private-Attribute Protection using Adversarial Learningcited by 21
- 2020Unbiased Learning for the Causal Effect of Recommendationcited by 18
- 2022Selective Fairness in Recommendation via Promptscited by 16
- 2023Adaptive Multi-Modalities Fusion in Sequential Recommendation Systemscited by 14
- 2021Prototypical Classifier for Robust Class-Imbalanced Learningcited by 10
- 2021Fairness-aware Personalized Ranking Recommendation via Adversarial Learningcited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.