From Asset Flow to Status, Action and Intention Discovery: Early Malice Detection in Cryptocurrency
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Cryptocurrency has been subject to illicit activities probably more often than traditional financial assets due to the pseudo-anonymous nature of its transacting entities. An ideal detection model is expected to achieve all three critical properties of (I) early detection, (II) good interpretability, and (III) versatility for various illicit activities. However, existing solutions cannot meet all these requirements, as most of them heavily rely on deep learning without interpretability and are only available for retrospective analysis of a specific illicit type. To tackle all these challenges, we propose Intention-Monitor for early malice detection in Bitcoin (BTC), where the on-chain record data for a certain address are much scarcer than other cryptocurrency platforms. We first define asset transfer paths with the Decision-Tree based feature Selection and Complement (DT-SC) to build different feature sets for different malice types. Then, the Status/Action Proposal Module (S/A-PM) and the Intention-VAE module generate the status, action, intent-snippet, and hidden intent-snippet embedding. With all these modules, our model is highly interpretable and can detect various illegal activities. Moreover, well-designed loss functions further enhance the prediction speed and model's interpretability. Extensive experiments on three real-world datasets demonstrate that our proposed algorithm outperforms the state-of-the-art methods. Furthermore, additional case studies justify our model can not only explain existing illicit patterns but can also find new suspicious characters.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 61 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Sep 2023.
Builds on
19 of 61 references.
References · 19
- 2014On the Properties of Neural Machine Translation: Encoder-Decoder Approachescited by 1,304
- 2019Anti-Money Laundering in Bitcoin: Experimenting with Graph Convolutional Networks for Financial Forensicscited by 164
- 2019Who Are the Phishers? Phishing Scam Detection on Ethereum via Network Embeddingcited by 39
- 2018CED: Credible Early Detection of Social Media Rumorscited by 26
- 2019A Survey on Ethereum Systems Security: Vulnerabilities, Attacks and Defensescited by 25
- 2020Detecting Mixing Services via Mining Bitcoin Transaction Network with Hybrid Motifscited by 23
- 2019T-EDGE: Temporal WEighted MultiDiGraph Embedding for Ethereum Transaction Network Analysiscited by 19
- 2022TTAGN: Temporal Transaction Aggregation Graph Network for Ethereum Phishing Scams Detectioncited by 18
- 2018Data mining for detecting Bitcoin Ponzi schemescited by 17
- 2019BitcoinHeist: Topological Data Analysis for Ransomware Detection on the Bitcoin Blockchaincited by 12
- 2018Ransomware Payments in the Bitcoin Ecosystemcited by 11
- 2020Modeling and Understanding Ethereum Transaction Records via a Complex Network Approachcited by 11
7 more
- 2019Identifying Illicit Accounts in Large Scale E-payment Networks -- A Graph Representation Learning Approachcited by 9
- 2019ChainNet: Learning on Blockchain Graphs with Topological Featurescited by 8
- 2018On the Economic Significance of Ransomware Campaigns: A Bitcoin Transactions Perspectivecited by 7
- 2018SAFE: A Neural Survival Analysis Model for Fraud Early Detectioncited by 7
- 2015Bitcoin Transaction Graph Analysiscited by 6
- 2016Anomaly Detection in the Bitcoin System - A Network Perspectivecited by 6
- 2017Wikipedia Vandal Early Detection: from User Behavior to User Embeddingcited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.