mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Exploring the Impact of Serverless Computing on Peer To Peer Training Machine Learning

arXiv 2309.14139 ↗First posted 25 Sep 2023cs.DC cs.AIcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The increasing demand for computational power in big data and machine learning has driven the development of distributed training methodologies. Among these, peer-to-peer (P2P) networks provide advantages such as enhanced scalability and fault tolerance. However, they also encounter challenges related to resource consumption, costs, and communication overhead as the number of participating peers grows. In this paper, we introduce a novel architecture that combines serverless computing with P2P networks for distributed training and present a method for efficient parallel gradient computation under resource constraints. Our findings show a significant enhancement in gradient computation time, with up to a 97.34% improvement compared to conventional P2P distributed training methods. As for costs, our examination confirmed that the serverless architecture could incur higher expenses, reaching up to 5.4 times more than instance-based architectures. It is essential to consider that these higher costs are associated with marked improvements in computation time, particularly under resource-constrained scenarios. Despite the cost-time trade-off, the serverless approach still holds promise due to its pay-as-you-go model. Utilizing dynamic resource allocation, it enables faster training times and optimized resource utilization, making it a promising candidate for a wide range of machine learning applications.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 45 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Sep 2023.

Builds on

20 of 45 references.

References · 20

  1. 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,364
  2. 2016SqueezeNet: AlexNet-level accuracy with 50x fewer parameters and <0.5MB model sizecited by 1,060
  3. 2019A Survey on Distributed Machine Learningcited by 188
  4. 2020On Biased Compression for Distributed Learningcited by 140
  5. 2019BrainTorrent: A Peer-to-Peer Environment for Decentralized Federated Learningcited by 117
  6. 2017Collaborative Deep Learning in Fixed Topology Networkscited by 60
  7. 2017Personalized and Private Peer-to-Peer Machine Learningcited by 54
  8. 2021Effective Model Sparsification by Scheduled Grow-and-Prune Methodscited by 26
  9. 2019Distributed Learning of Deep Neural Networks using Independent Subnet Trainingcited by 20
  10. 2020Communication-Efficient Decentralized Learning with Sparsification and Adaptive Peer Selectioncited by 20
  11. 2015Strategies and Principles of Distributed Machine Learning on Big Datacited by 16
  12. 2021Towards Demystifying Serverless Machine Learning Trainingcited by 16
8 more
  1. 2021FedLess: Secure and Scalable Federated Learning Using Serverless Computingcited by 13
  2. 2019Serverless Computing: A Survey of Opportunities, Challenges and Applicationscited by 11
  3. 2019Performance Analysis and Comparison of Distributed Machine Learning Systemscited by 9
  4. 2020Communication-efficient Decentralized Machine Learning over Heterogeneous Networkscited by 9
  5. 2022SMLT: A Serverless Framework for Scalable and Adaptive Machine Learning Design and Trainingcited by 4
  6. 2019Stratum: A Serverless Framework for Lifecycle Management of Machine Learning based Data Analytics Taskscited by 3
  7. 2022MLLess: Achieving Cost Efficiency in Serverless Machine Learning Trainingcited by 3
  8. 2018Sparse Deep Neural Network Exact Solutionscited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 2.

3 papers.