mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Does the "most sinfully decadent cake ever" taste good? Answering Yes/No Questions from Figurative Contexts

arXiv 2309.13748 ↗First posted 24 Sep 2023cs.CLcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Figurative language is commonplace in natural language, and while making communication memorable and creative, can be difficult to understand. In this work, we investigate the robustness of Question Answering (QA) models on figurative text. Yes/no questions, in particular, are a useful probe of figurative language understanding capabilities of large language models. We propose FigurativeQA, a set of 1000 yes/no questions with figurative and non-figurative contexts, extracted from the domains of restaurant and product reviews. We show that state-of-the-art BERT-based QA models exhibit an average performance drop of up to 15% points when answering questions from figurative contexts, as compared to non-figurative ones. While models like GPT-3 and ChatGPT are better at handling figurative texts, we show that further performance gains can be achieved by automatically simplifying the figurative contexts into their non-figurative (literal) counterparts. We find that the best overall model is ChatGPT with chain-of-thought prompting to generate non-figurative contexts. Our work provides a promising direction for building more robust QA models with figurative language understanding capabilities.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Sep 2023.

Builds on

13 of 36 references.

References · 13

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  2. 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,372
  3. 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,459
  4. 2015Character-level Convolutional Networks for Text Classificationcited by 2,330
  5. 2019BoolQ: Exploring the Surprising Difficulty of Natural Yes/No Questionscited by 2,183
  6. 2022Testing the Ability of Language Models to Interpret Figurative Languagecited by 67
  7. 2021RiddleSense: Reasoning about Riddle Questions Featuring Linguistic Creativity and Commonsense Knowledgecited by 61
  8. 2022Can Transformer be Too Compositional? Analysing Idiom Processing in Neural Machine Translationcited by 28
  9. 2021Figurative Language in Recognizing Textual Entailmentcited by 26
  10. 2021Investigating Robustness of Dialog Models to Popular Figurative Language Constructscited by 19
  11. 2017Asking Too Much? The Rhetorical Role of Questions in Political Discoursecited by 8
  12. 2021From Solving a Problem Boldly to Cutting the Gordian Knot: Idiomatic Text Generationcited by 5
1 more
  1. 2017Harvesting Creative Templates for Generating Stylistically Varied Restaurant Reviewscited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 1.

2 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2022MiQA: A Benchmark for Inference on Metaphorical Questions
  2. 2022Inferring Implicit Relations in Complex Questions with Language Models
  3. 2026Rethinking Faithfulness in LLMs: A Pairwise Context-Sensitive Perspective
  4. 2024Understanding Figurative Meaning through Explainable Visual Entailment
  5. 2026Inferential Question Answering
  6. 2026ReasonLab: A Controlled and Auditable Evaluation of Prompting Techniques for Multiple-Choice QA
  7. 2025MinosEval: Distinguishing Factoid and Non-Factoid for Tailored Open-Ended QA Evaluation with LLMs
  8. 2026RespondeoQA: a Benchmark for Bilingual Latin-English Question Answering