mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Inter-vendor harmonization of Computed Tomography (CT) reconstruction kernels using unpaired image translation

arXiv 2309.12953 ↗First posted 22 Sep 2023eess.IV cs.CVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The reconstruction kernel in computed tomography (CT) generation determines the texture of the image. Consistency in reconstruction kernels is important as the underlying CT texture can impact measurements during quantitative image analysis. Harmonization (i.e., kernel conversion) minimizes differences in measurements due to inconsistent reconstruction kernels. Existing methods investigate harmonization of CT scans in single or multiple manufacturers. However, these methods require paired scans of hard and soft reconstruction kernels that are spatially and anatomically aligned. Additionally, a large number of models need to be trained across different kernel pairs within manufacturers. In this study, we adopt an unpaired image translation approach to investigate harmonization between and across reconstruction kernels from different manufacturers by constructing a multipath cycle generative adversarial network (GAN). We use hard and soft reconstruction kernels from the Siemens and GE vendors from the National Lung Screening Trial dataset. We use 50 scans from each reconstruction kernel and train a multipath cycle GAN. To evaluate the effect of harmonization on the reconstruction kernels, we harmonize 50 scans each from Siemens hard kernel, GE soft kernel and GE hard kernel to a reference Siemens soft kernel (B30f) and evaluate percent emphysema. We fit a linear model by considering the age, smoking status, sex and vendor and perform an analysis of variance (ANOVA) on the emphysema scores. Our approach minimizes differences in emphysema measurement and highlights the impact of age, sex, smoking status and vendor on emphysema quantification.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Sep 2023.

Builds on

12 of 31 references.

References · 12

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
  2. 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,713
  3. 2022Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 5,627
  4. 2016Image-to-Image Translation with Conditional Adversarial Networkscited by 4,527
  5. 2014Conditional Generative Adversarial Netscited by 2,162
  6. 2017StarGAN: Unified Generative Adversarial Networks for Multi-Domain Image-to-Image Translationcited by 1,039
  7. 2016Least Squares Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 1,001
  8. 2015Accurate Image Super-Resolution Using Very Deep Convolutional Networkscited by 903
  9. 2018Multimodal Unsupervised Image-to-Image Translationcited by 795
  10. 2017Unsupervised Image-to-Image Translation Networkscited by 603
  11. 2021Image-to-Image Translation: Methods and Applicationscited by 116
  12. 2021Cross-Vendor CT Image Data Harmonization Using CVH-CTcited by 8

Built on by

Not cited yet.