mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Defeasible Reasoning with Knowledge Graphs

arXiv 2309.12731 ↗First posted 22 Sep 2023cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Human knowledge is subject to uncertainties, imprecision, incompleteness and inconsistencies. Moreover, the meaning of many everyday terms is dependent on the context. That poses a huge challenge for the Semantic Web. This paper introduces work on an intuitive notation and model for defeasible reasoning with imperfect knowledge, and relates it to previous work on argumentation theory. PKN is to N3 as defeasible reasoning is to deductive logic. Further work is needed on an intuitive syntax for describing reasoning strategies and tactics in declarative terms, drawing upon the AIF ontology for inspiration. The paper closes with observations on symbolic approaches in the era of large language models.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 0 of its 15 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Sep 2023.

Builds on

0 of 15 references.

No references here yet.

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024Benchmarking Defeasible Reasoning with Large Language Models -- Initial Experiments and Future Directions
  2. 2026ArgGYM: A Procedural, Engine-Verified Benchmark for Structured Defeasible Reasoning
  3. 2025Semantic-Aware Logical Reasoning via a Semiotic Framework
  4. 2026DERELAB: Probing Defeasible Reasoning and Confirmation Bias in LLMs with a Generative Benchmark
  5. 2025AKReF: An argumentative knowledge representation framework for structured argumentation
  6. 2026DeFAb: A Verifiable Benchmark for Defeasible Abduction in Foundation Models
  7. 2023BoardgameQA: A Dataset for Natural Language Reasoning with Contradictory Information
  8. 2023Natural Language Reasoning, A Survey