mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Semantic similarity prediction is better than other semantic similarity measures

arXiv 2309.12697 ↗First posted 22 Sep 2023cs.CL cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Semantic similarity between natural language texts is typically measured either by looking at the overlap between subsequences (e.g., BLEU) or by using embeddings (e.g., BERTScore, S-BERT). Within this paper, we argue that when we are only interested in measuring the semantic similarity, it is better to directly predict the similarity using a fine-tuned model for such a task. Using a fine-tuned model for the Semantic Textual Similarity Benchmark tasks (STS-B) from the GLUE benchmark, we define the STSScore approach and show that the resulting similarity is better aligned with our expectations on a robust semantic similarity measure than other approaches.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 25 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Sep 2023.

Builds on

10 of 25 references.

References · 10

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  3. 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,266
  4. 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,049
  5. 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,462
  6. 2018GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Natural Language Understandingcited by 4,854
  7. 2013Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Spacecited by 4,346
  8. 2019SuperGLUE: A Stickier Benchmark for General-Purpose Language Understanding Systemscited by 1,718
  9. 2017SemEval-2017 Task 1: Semantic Textual Similarity - Multilingual and Cross-lingual Focused Evaluationcited by 998
  10. 2017Relevance of Unsupervised Metrics in Task-Oriented Dialogue for Evaluating Natural Language Generationcited by 61

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.