Examining the Influence of Varied Levels of Domain Knowledge Base Inclusion in GPT-based Intelligent Tutors
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Recent advancements in large language models (LLMs) have facilitated the development of chatbots with sophisticated conversational capabilities. However, LLMs exhibit frequent inaccurate responses to queries, hindering applications in educational settings. In this paper, we investigate the effectiveness of integrating a knowledge base (KB) with LLM intelligent tutors to increase response reliability. To achieve this, we design a scaleable KB that affords educational supervisors seamless integration of lesson curricula, which is automatically processed by the intelligent tutoring system. We then detail an evaluation, where student participants were presented with questions about the artificial intelligence curriculum to respond to. GPT-4 intelligent tutors with varying hierarchies of KB access and human domain experts then assessed these responses. Lastly, students cross-examined the intelligent tutors' responses to the domain experts' and ranked their various pedagogical abilities. Results suggest that, although these intelligent tutors still demonstrate a lower accuracy compared to domain experts, the accuracy of the intelligent tutors increases when access to a KB is granted. We also observe that the intelligent tutors with KB access exhibit better pedagogical abilities to speak like a teacher and understand students than those of domain experts, while their ability to help students remains lagging behind domain experts.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Sep 2023.
Builds on
10 of 32 references.
References · 10
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
- 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,266
- 2016SQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Textcited by 4,115
- 2021On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Modelscited by 3,961
- 2023Generative Agents: Interactive Simulacra of Human Behaviorcited by 3,500
- 2023AGIEval: A Human-Centric Benchmark for Evaluating Foundation Modelscited by 701
- 2020Recipes for building an open-domain chatbotcited by 593
- 2022The AI Teacher Test: Measuring the Pedagogical Ability of Blender and GPT-3 in Educational Dialoguescited by 78
- 2021Measuring Conversational Uptake: A Case Study on Student-Teacher Interactionscited by 44
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 3; 2026: 1.
4 papers.
- 2025The Lazy Student's Dream: ChatGPT Passing an Engineering Course on Its Owncited by 2
- 2025CyberBOT: Towards Reliable Cybersecurity Education via Ontology-Grounded Retrieval Augmented Generationcited by 1
- 2026LLM Prompt Evaluation for Educational Applicationscited by 1
- 2025Examining GPT's Capability to Generate and Map Course Concepts and Their Relationshipcited by 0
- 2026LLM Prompt Evaluation for Educational Applications22 Jan 2026
- 2025Examining GPT's Capability to Generate and Map Course Concepts and Their Relationship11 Apr 2025
- 2025CyberBOT: Towards Reliable Cybersecurity Education via Ontology-Grounded Retrieval Augmented Generation1 Apr 2025
- 2025The Lazy Student's Dream: ChatGPT Passing an Engineering Course on Its Own23 Feb 2025