On the Relationship between Skill Neurons and Robustness in Prompt Tuning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Prompt Tuning is a popular parameter-efficient finetuning method for pre-trained large language models (PLMs). Based on experiments with RoBERTa, it has been suggested that Prompt Tuning activates specific neurons in the transformer's feed-forward networks, that are highly predictive and selective for the given task. In this paper, we study the robustness of Prompt Tuning in relation to these "skill neurons", using RoBERTa and T5. We show that prompts tuned for a specific task are transferable to tasks of the same type but are not very robust to adversarial data. While prompts tuned for RoBERTa yield below-chance performance on adversarial data, prompts tuned for T5 are slightly more robust and retain above-chance performance in two out of three cases. At the same time, we replicate the finding that skill neurons exist in RoBERTa and further show that skill neurons also exist in T5. Interestingly, the skill neurons of T5 determined on non-adversarial data are also among the most predictive neurons on the adversarial data, which is not the case for RoBERTa. We conclude that higher adversarial robustness may be related to a model's ability to consistently activate the relevant skill neurons on adversarial data.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 30 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Sep 2023.
Builds on
30 of 46 references.
References · 30
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
- 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,599
- 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,380
- 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,372
- 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,155
- 2018GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Natural Language Understandingcited by 4,899
- 2019Parameter-Efficient Transfer Learning for NLPcited by 4,236
- 2021Prefix-Tuning: Optimizing Continuous Prompts for Generationcited by 3,915
- 2021The Power of Scale for Parameter-Efficient Prompt Tuningcited by 3,795
- 2020Transformer Feed-Forward Layers Are Key-Value Memoriescited by 1,336
- 2020Beyond Accuracy: Behavioral Testing of NLP models with CheckListcited by 1,006
- 2019Adversarial NLI: A New Benchmark for Natural Language Understandingcited by 807
18 more
- 2020Aligning AI With Shared Human Valuescited by 723
- 2021GPT Understands, Toocited by 716
- 2019Is BERT Really Robust? A Strong Baseline for Natural Language Attack on Text Classification and Entailmentcited by 671
- 2021Knowledge Neurons in Pretrained Transformerscited by 601
- 2017Adversarial Examples for Evaluating Reading Comprehension Systemscited by 571
- 2017Learning multiple visual domains with residual adapterscited by 557
- 2022Transformer Feed-Forward Layers Build Predictions by Promoting Concepts in the Vocabulary Spacecited by 532
- 2020BERT-ATTACK: Adversarial Attack Against BERT Using BERTcited by 491
- 2020BAE: BERT-based Adversarial Examples for Text Classificationcited by 316
- 2021Adversarial GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark for Robustness Evaluation of Language Modelscited by 232
- 2018Stress Test Evaluation for Natural Language Inferencecited by 213
- 2022The Lazy Neuron Phenomenon: On Emergence of Activation Sparsity in Transformerscited by 122
- 2021On Transferability of Prompt Tuning for Natural Language Processingcited by 75
- 2022Finding Skill Neurons in Pre-trained Transformer-based Language Modelscited by 66
- 2022Kformer: Knowledge Injection in Transformer Feed-Forward Layerscited by 37
- 2021Analyzing Commonsense Emergence in Few-shot Knowledge Modelscited by 34
- 2020Finding Experts in Transformer Modelscited by 28
- 2020On Sparsifying Encoder Outputs in Sequence-to-Sequence Modelscited by 8
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1.
1 paper.