DeepTheft: Stealing DNN Model Architectures through Power Side Channel
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Deep Neural Network (DNN) models are often deployed in resource-sharing clouds as Machine Learning as a Service (MLaaS) to provide inference services.To steal model architectures that are of valuable intellectual properties, a class of attacks has been proposed via different side-channel leakage, posing a serious security challenge to MLaaS. Also targeting MLaaS, we propose a new end-to-end attack, DeepTheft, to accurately recover complex DNN model architectures on general processors via the RAPL-based power side channel. However, an attacker can acquire only a low sampling rate (1 KHz) of the time-series energy traces from the RAPL interface, rendering existing techniques ineffective in stealing large and deep DNN models. To this end, we design a novel and generic learning-based framework consisting of a set of meta-models, based on which DeepTheft is demonstrated to have high accuracy in recovering a large number (thousands) of models architectures from different model families including the deepest ResNet152. Particularly, DeepTheft has achieved a Levenshtein Distance Accuracy of 99.75% in recovering network structures, and a weighted average F1 score of 99.60% in recovering diverse layer-wise hyperparameters. Besides, our proposed learning framework is general to other time-series side-channel signals. To validate its generalization, another existing side channel is exploited, i.e., CPU frequency. Different from RAPL, CPU frequency is accessible to unprivileged users in bare-metal OSes. By using our generic learning framework trained against CPU frequency traces, DeepTheft has shown similarly high attack performance in stealing model architectures.
Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 21 Sep 2023.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 3; 2026: 5.
10 papers.
- 2025MoEcho: Exploiting Side-Channel Attacks to Compromise User Privacy in Mixture-of-Experts LLMscited by 13
- 2024Side-Channel Analysis of OpenVINO-based Neural Network Modelscited by 4
- 2025CompLeak: Deep Learning Model Compression Exacerbates Privacy Leakagecited by 3
- 2025Stealing AI Model Weights Through Covert Communication Channelscited by 2
- 2026Turning Black Box into White Box: Dataset Distillation Leakscited by 1
- 2024A Divide-and-Conquer Strategy for Hard-Label Extraction of Deep Neural Networks via Side-Channel Attackscited by 0
- 2026Evasion of IoT Malware Detection via Dummy Code Injectioncited by 0
- 2026Leaky Language Models: Stealing Architecture and Inference Optimizations via Per-Token Timingcited by 0
- 2026Privacy-Preserving AI Verification via Minimal Information Disclosurecited by 0
- 2026Detokenization Leaks: Reconstructing Local LLM Outputs From Cache Tracescited by 0
- 2026Detokenization Leaks: Reconstructing Local LLM Outputs From Cache Traces6 Sep 2026
- 2026Privacy-Preserving AI Verification via Minimal Information Disclosure3 Aug 2026
- 2026Leaky Language Models: Stealing Architecture and Inference Optimizations via Per-Token Timing22 Jul 2026
- 2026Turning Black Box into White Box: Dataset Distillation Leaks1 Mar 2026
- 2026Evasion of IoT Malware Detection via Dummy Code Injection9 Feb 2026
- 2025Stealing AI Model Weights Through Covert Communication Channels30 Sep 2025
- 2025MoEcho: Exploiting Side-Channel Attacks to Compromise User Privacy in Mixture-of-Experts LLMs20 Aug 2025
- 2025CompLeak: Deep Learning Model Compression Exacerbates Privacy Leakage22 Jul 2025
- 2024A Divide-and-Conquer Strategy for Hard-Label Extraction of Deep Neural Networks via Side-Channel Attacks15 Nov 2024
- 2024Side-Channel Analysis of OpenVINO-based Neural Network Models23 Jul 2024