mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Syntactic Variation Across the Grammar: Modelling a Complex Adaptive System

arXiv 2309.11869 ↗First posted 21 Sep 2023cs.CLcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

While language is a complex adaptive system, most work on syntactic variation observes a few individual constructions in isolation from the rest of the grammar. This means that the grammar, a network which connects thousands of structures at different levels of abstraction, is reduced to a few disconnected variables. This paper quantifies the impact of such reductions by systematically modelling dialectal variation across 49 local populations of English speakers in 16 countries. We perform dialect classification with both an entire grammar as well as with isolated nodes within the grammar in order to characterize the syntactic differences between these dialects. The results show, first, that many individual nodes within the grammar are subject to variation but, in isolation, none perform as well as the grammar as a whole. This indicates that an important part of syntactic variation consists of interactions between different parts of the grammar. Second, the results show that the similarity between dialects depends heavily on the sub-set of the grammar being observed: for example, New Zealand English could be more similar to Australian English in phrasal verbs but at the same time more similar to UK English in dative phrases.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 61 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Sep 2023.

Builds on

20 of 61 references.

References · 20

  1. 2017Accelerated Hierarchical Density Clusteringcited by 102
  2. 2020Mapping Languages: The Corpus of Global Language Usecited by 42
  3. 2021Characterizing English Variation across Social Media Communities with BERTcited by 20
  4. 2017Dialectometric analysis of language variation in Twittercited by 14
  5. 2019Modeling Global Syntactic Variation in English Using Dialect Classificationcited by 13
  6. 2017A Neural Model for User Geolocation and Lexical Dialectologycited by 12
  7. 2014Crowdsourcing Dialect Characterization through Twittercited by 11
  8. 2019Frequency vs. Association for Constraint Selection in Usage-Based Construction Grammarcited by 11
  9. 2021Finding Variants for Construction-Based Dialectometry: A Corpus-Based Approach to Regional CxGscited by 11
  10. 2021Global Syntactic Variation in Seven Languages: Towards a Computational Dialectologycited by 11
  11. 2019Modeling the Complexity and Descriptive Adequacy of Construction Grammarscited by 9
  12. 2017Mapping the Americanization of English in Space and Timecited by 6
8 more
  1. 2021Production vs Perception: The Role of Individuality in Usage-Based Grammar Inductioncited by 6
  2. 2021Learned Construction Grammars Converge Across Registers Given Increased Exposurecited by 6
  3. 2022Exposure and Emergence in Usage-Based Grammar: Computational Experiments in 35 Languagescited by 6
  4. 2022Stability of Syntactic Dialect Classification Over Space and Timecited by 5
  5. 2022Language Identification for Austronesian Languagescited by 3
  6. 2023Exploring the Constructicon: Linguistic Analysis of a Computational CxGcited by 3
  7. 2023Variation and Instability in Dialect-Based Embedding Spacescited by 3
  8. 2016A Character-level Convolutional Neural Network for Distinguishing Similar Languages and Dialectscited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1.

1 paper.