mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Improving Opioid Use Disorder Risk Modelling through Behavioral and Genetic Feature Integration

arXiv 2309.10837 ↗First posted 19 Sep 2023q-bio.QM cs.CY cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Opioids are an effective analgesic for acute and chronic pain, but also carry a considerable risk of addiction leading to millions of opioid use disorder (OUD) cases and tens of thousands of premature deaths in the United States yearly. Estimating OUD risk prior to prescription could improve the efficacy of treatment regimens, monitoring programs, and intervention strategies, but risk estimation is typically based on self-reported data or questionnaires. We develop an experimental design and computational methods that combine genetic variants associated with OUD with behavioral features extracted from GPS and Wi-Fi spatiotemporal coordinates to assess OUD risk. Since both OUD mobility and genetic data do not exist for the same cohort, we develop algorithms to (1) generate mobility features from empirical distributions and (2) synthesize mobility and genetic samples assuming an expected level of disease co-occurrence. We show that integrating genetic and mobility modalities improves risk modelling using classification accuracy, area under the precision-recall and receiver operator characteristic curves, and F1 score. Interpreting the fitted models suggests that mobility features have more influence on OUD risk, although the genetic contribution was significant, particularly in linear models. While there exist concerns with respect to privacy, security, bias, and generalizability that must be evaluated in clinical trials before being implemented in practice, our framework provides preliminary evidence that behavioral and genetic features may improve OUD risk estimation to assist with personalized clinical decision-making.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 82 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Sep 2023.

Builds on

7 of 82 references.

References · 7

  1. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
  2. 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,917
  3. 2020Does the Whole Exceed its Parts? The Effect of AI Explanations on Complementary Team Performancecited by 399
  4. 2021Interpretable Machine Learning: Fundamental Principles and 10 Grand Challengescited by 367
  5. 2019Explainable Machine Learning in Deploymentcited by 211
  6. 2020Uncertainty in Gradient Boosting via Ensemblescited by 56
  7. 2018Human-in-the-Loop Interpretability Priorcited by 36

Built on by

Not cited yet.