mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Who to Trust, How and Why: Untangling AI Ethics Principles, Trustworthiness and Trust

arXiv 2309.10318 ↗First posted 19 Sep 2023cs.AI cs.CYcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We present an overview of the literature on trust in AI and AI trustworthiness and argue for the need to distinguish these concepts more clearly and to gather more empirically evidence on what contributes to people s trusting behaviours. We discuss that trust in AI involves not only reliance on the system itself, but also trust in the developers of the AI system. AI ethics principles such as explainability and transparency are often assumed to promote user trust, but empirical evidence of how such features actually affect how users perceive the system s trustworthiness is not as abundance or not that clear. AI systems should be recognised as socio-technical systems, where the people involved in designing, developing, deploying, and using the system are as important as the system for determining whether it is trustworthy. Without recognising these nuances, trust in AI and trustworthy AI risk becoming nebulous terms for any desirable feature for AI systems.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 5 of its 21 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Sep 2023.

Builds on

5 of 21 references.

References · 5

  1. 2016The Mythos of Model Interpretabilitycited by 716
  2. 2020Formalizing Trust in Artificial Intelligence: Prerequisites, Causes and Goals of Human Trust in AIcited by 166
  3. 2018Explaining Explanations in AIcited by 136
  4. 2019Principles alone cannot guarantee ethical AIcited by 134
  5. 2023A Systematic Literature Review of User Trust in AI-Enabled Systems: An HCI Perspectivecited by 33

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2.

2 papers.