mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

How much can ChatGPT really help Computational Biologists in Programming?

arXiv 2309.09126 ↗First posted 17 Sep 2023cs.AI cs.CLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

ChatGPT, a recently developed product by openAI, is successfully leaving its mark as a multi-purpose natural language based chatbot. In this paper, we are more interested in analyzing its potential in the field of computational biology. A major share of work done by computational biologists these days involve coding up bioinformatics algorithms, analyzing data, creating pipelining scripts and even machine learning modeling and feature extraction. This paper focuses on the potential influence (both positive and negative) of ChatGPT in the mentioned aspects with illustrative examples from different perspectives. Compared to other fields of computer science, computational biology has - (1) less coding resources, (2) more sensitivity and bias issues (deals with medical data) and (3) more necessity of coding assistance (people from diverse background come to this field). Keeping such issues in mind, we cover use cases such as code writing, reviewing, debugging, converting, refactoring and pipelining using ChatGPT from the perspective of computational biologists in this paper.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 54 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Sep 2023.

Builds on

18 of 54 references.

References · 18

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  3. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  4. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
  5. 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 14,132
  6. 2021Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Codecited by 8,320
  7. 2021Zero-Shot Text-to-Image Generationcited by 4,288
  8. 2021Program Synthesis with Large Language Modelscited by 3,637
  9. 2022Competition-Level Code Generation with AlphaCodecited by 1,462
  10. 2023Mathematical Capabilities of ChatGPTcited by 268
  11. 2023A Comprehensive Capability Analysis of GPT-3 and GPT-3.5 Series Modelscited by 246
  12. 2023A Categorical Archive of ChatGPT Failurescited by 168
6 more
  1. 2014A Tutorial on Principal Component Analysiscited by 141
  2. 2023An Analysis of the Automatic Bug Fixing Performance of ChatGPTcited by 110
  3. 2023ChatGPT Prompt Patterns for Improving Code Quality, Refactoring, Requirements Elicitation, and Software Designcited by 66
  4. 2023One Small Step for Generative AI, One Giant Leap for AGI: A Complete Survey on ChatGPT in AIGC Eracited by 55
  5. 2021A large-scale study on research code quality and executioncited by 22
  6. 2016An Introduction to Programming for Bioscientists: A Python-based Primercited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.