mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Solving Quadratic Systems with Full-Rank Matrices Using Sparse or Generative Priors

arXiv 2309.09032 ↗First posted 16 Sep 2023cs.IT cs.LG eess.SPcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The problem of recovering a signal boldsymbol x∈ ℝn from a quadratic system yi=boldsymbol x^topboldsymbol Aiboldsymbol x, i=1,ldots,m with full-rank matrices boldsymbol Ai frequently arises in applications such as unassigned distance geometry and sub-wavelength imaging. With i.i.d. standard Gaussian matrices boldsymbol Ai, this paper addresses the high-dimensional case where mll n by incorporating prior knowledge of boldsymbol x. First, we consider a k-sparse boldsymbol x and introduce the thresholded Wirtinger flow (TWF) algorithm that does not require the sparsity level k. TWF comprises two steps: the spectral initialization that identifies a point sufficiently close to boldsymbol x (up to a sign flip) when m=O(k2log n), and the thresholded gradient descent which, when provided a good initialization, produces a sequence linearly converging to boldsymbol x with m=O(klog n) measurements. Second, we explore the generative prior, assuming that x lies in the range of an L-Lipschitz continuous generative model with k-dimensional inputs in an ℓ2-ball of radius r. With an estimate correlated with the signal, we develop the projected gradient descent (PGD) algorithm that also comprises two steps: the projected power method that provides an initial vector with Obig(√frack log Lmbig) ℓ2-error given m=O(klog(Lnr)) measurements, and the projected gradient descent that refines the ℓ2-error to O(δ) at a geometric rate when m=O(klogfracLrnδ2). Experimental results corroborate our theoretical findings and show that: (i) our approach for the sparse case notably outperforms the existing provable algorithm sparse power factorization; (ii) leveraging the generative prior allows for precise image recovery in the MNIST dataset from a small number of quadratic measurements.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 31 of its 78 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Sep 2023.

Builds on

31 of 78 references.

References · 31

  1. 2017Compressed Sensing using Generative Modelscited by 339
  2. 2018Nonconvex Optimization Meets Low-Rank Matrix Factorization: An Overviewcited by 160
  3. 2014Phase Retrieval via Wirtinger Flow: Theory and Algorithmscited by 125
  4. 2015Low-rank Solutions of Linear Matrix Equations via Procrustes Flowcited by 97
  5. 2018Phase Retrieval Under a Generative Priorcited by 73
  6. 2018Solving Linear Inverse Problems Using GAN Priors: An Algorithm with Provable Guaranteescited by 58
  7. 2015Solving Random Quadratic Systems of Equations Is Nearly as Easy as Solving Linear Systemscited by 50
  8. 2018Modeling Sparse Deviations for Compressed Sensing using Generative Modelscited by 33
  9. 2016Solving Systems of Random Quadratic Equations via Truncated Amplitude Flowcited by 29
  10. 2015Optimal Rates of Convergence for Noisy Sparse Phase Retrieval via Thresholded Wirtinger Flowcited by 23
  11. 2020Sample Complexity Bounds for 1-bit Compressive Sensing and Binary Stable Embeddings with Generative Priorscited by 21
  12. 2019Exact asymptotics for phase retrieval and compressed sensing with random generative priorscited by 20
19 more
  1. 2019Alternating Phase Projected Gradient Descent with Generative Priors for Solving Compressive Phase Retrievalcited by 18
  2. 2021Towards Sample-Optimal Compressive Phase Retrieval with Sparse and Generative Priorscited by 14
  3. 2022High Dimensional Statistical Estimation under Uniformly Dithered One-bit Quantizationcited by 13
  4. 2022Generative Principal Component Analysiscited by 12
  5. 2022Non-Iterative Recovery from Nonlinear Observations using Generative Modelscited by 9
  6. 2013Sparse Phase Retrieval: Uniqueness Guarantees and Recovery Algorithmscited by 8
  7. 2016Sparse Phase Retrieval via Truncated Amplitude Flowcited by 8
  8. 2022Misspecified Phase Retrieval with Generative Priorscited by 7
  9. 2015Near-Optimal Bounds for Binary Embeddings of Arbitrary Setscited by 5
  10. 2018Reconstructing Point Sets from Distance Distributionscited by 4
  11. 2018Geometric Invariants for Sparse Unknown View Tomographycited by 4
  12. 20203D unknown view tomography via rotation invariantscited by 4
  13. 2020On the Sample Complexity and Optimization Landscape for Quadratic Feasibility Problemscited by 2
  14. 2021Riemannian thresholding methods for row-sparse and low-rank matrix recoverycited by 2
  15. 2022An Oracle Gradient Regularized Newton Method for Quadratic Measurements Regressioncited by 2
  16. 2022Error Bound of Empirical ℓ2 Risk Minimization for Noisy Standard and Generalized Phase Retrieval Problemscited by 2
  17. 2022Orthogonal Matrix Retrieval with Spatial Consensus for 3D Unknown-View Tomographycited by 2
  18. 2022Phase Retrieval of Quaternion Signal via Wirtinger Flowcited by 2
  19. 2017Power System State Estimation via Feasible Point Pursuit: Algorithms and Cramer-Rao Boundcited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 2.

4 papers.