mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

ChatGPT-4 with Code Interpreter can be used to solve introductory college-level vector calculus and electromagnetism problems

arXiv 2309.08881 ↗First posted 16 Sep 2023cs.AI cs.CE physics.ed-phcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We evaluated ChatGPT 3.5, 4, and 4 with Code Interpreter on a set of college-level engineering-math and electromagnetism problems, such as those often given to sophomore electrical engineering majors. We selected a set of 13 problems, and had ChatGPT solve them multiple times, using a fresh instance (chat) each time. We found that ChatGPT-4 with Code Interpreter was able to satisfactorily solve most problems we tested most of the time -- a major improvement over the performance of ChatGPT-4 (or 3.5) without Code Interpreter. The performance of ChatGPT was observed to be somewhat stochastic, and we found that solving the same problem N times in new ChatGPT instances and taking the most-common answer was an effective strategy. Based on our findings and observations, we provide some recommendations for instructors and students of classes at this level.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 17 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Sep 2023.

Builds on

6 of 17 references.

References · 6

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  2. 2023Mathematical Capabilities of ChatGPTcited by 268
  3. 2023SciBench: Evaluating College-Level Scientific Problem-Solving Abilities of Large Language Modelscited by 256
  4. 2023SciEval: A Multi-Level Large Language Model Evaluation Benchmark for Scientific Researchcited by 115
  5. 2023Have LLMs Advanced Enough? A Challenging Problem Solving Benchmark For Large Language Modelscited by 77
  6. 2023Testing GPT-4 with Wolfram Alpha and Code Interpreter plug-ins on math and science problemscited by 12

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.