Concept explainability for plant diseases classification
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Plant diseases remain a considerable threat to food security and agricultural sustainability. Rapid and early identification of these diseases has become a significant concern motivating several studies to rely on the increasing global digitalization and the recent advances in computer vision based on deep learning. In fact, plant disease classification based on deep convolutional neural networks has shown impressive performance. However, these methods have yet to be adopted globally due to concerns regarding their robustness, transparency, and the lack of explainability compared with their human experts counterparts. Methods such as saliency-based approaches associating the network output to perturbations of the input pixels have been proposed to give insights into these algorithms. Still, they are not easily comprehensible and not intuitive for human users and are threatened by bias. In this work, we deploy a method called Testing with Concept Activation Vectors (TCAV) that shifts the focus from pixels to user-defined concepts. To the best of our knowledge, our paper is the first to employ this method in the field of plant disease classification. Important concepts such as color, texture and disease related concepts were analyzed. The results suggest that concept-based explanation methods can significantly benefit automated plant disease identification.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Sep 2023.
Builds on
11 of 28 references.
References · 11
- 2015Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Visioncited by 5,451
- 2014Going Deeper with Convolutionscited by 4,231
- 2013Visualizing and Understanding Convolutional Networkscited by 2,278
- 2013Describing Textures in the Wildcited by 2,110
- 2017Towards A Rigorous Science of Interpretable Machine Learningcited by 1,400
- 2017Interpretability Beyond Feature Attribution: Quantitative Testing with Concept Activation Vectors (TCAV)cited by 1,309
- 2017Interpretation of Neural Networks is Fragilecited by 443
- 2017The (Un)reliability of saliency methodscited by 331
- 2015An open access repository of images on plant health to enable the development of mobile disease diagnosticscited by 132
- 2020On Interpretability of Deep Learning based Skin Lesion Classifiers using Concept Activation Vectorscited by 39
- 2019Deep interpretable architecture for plant diseases classificationcited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.