mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

HINT: Healthy Influential-Noise based Training to Defend against Data Poisoning Attacks

arXiv 2309.08549 ↗First posted 15 Sep 2023cs.LG cs.AI cs.CRcited by 1

On the map: LLM safety and security → Backdoor and data poisoning attacks

Abstract (arXiv)

While numerous defense methods have been proposed to prohibit potential poisoning attacks from untrusted data sources, most research works only defend against specific attacks, which leaves many avenues for an adversary to exploit. In this work, we propose an efficient and robust training approach to defend against data poisoning attacks based on influence functions, named Healthy Influential-Noise based Training. Using influence functions, we craft healthy noise that helps to harden the classification model against poisoning attacks without significantly affecting the generalization ability on test data. In addition, our method can perform effectively when only a subset of the training data is modified, instead of the current method of adding noise to all examples that has been used in several previous works. We conduct comprehensive evaluations over two image datasets with state-of-the-art poisoning attacks under different realistic attack scenarios. Our empirical results show that HINT can efficiently protect deep learning models against the effect of both untargeted and targeted poisoning attacks.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Backdoor and data poisoning attacks, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security. Builds on 24 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Sep 2023.

Builds on

24 of 34 references.

Closest ancestors · 3

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2022Not All Poisons are Created Equal: Robust Training against Data Poisoning18 Oct
  2. 2022Friendly Noise against Adversarial Noise: A Powerful Defense against Data Poisoning Attacks14 Aug
  3. 2021What Doesn't Kill You Makes You Robust(er): How to Adversarially Train against Data Poisoning26 Feb

Other references · 21

  1. 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,326
  2. 2016Deep Learning with Differential Privacycited by 2,682
  3. 2017Understanding Black-box Predictions via Influence Functionscited by 1,714
  4. 2018Poison Frogs! Targeted Clean-Label Poisoning Attacks on Neural Networkscited by 500
  5. 2018Spectral Signatures in Backdoor Attackscited by 457
  6. 2018Detecting Backdoor Attacks on Deep Neural Networks by Activation Clusteringcited by 429
  7. 2020Influence Functions in Deep Learning Are Fragilecited by 247
  8. 2020Attacks Which Do Not Kill Training Make Adversarial Learning Strongercited by 242
  9. 2017Towards Poisoning of Deep Learning Algorithms with Back-gradient Optimizationcited by 188
  10. 2020Witches' Brew: Industrial Scale Data Poisoning via Gradient Matchingcited by 156
  11. 2019Transferable Clean-Label Poisoning Attacks on Deep Neural Netscited by 129
  12. 2020RAB: Provable Robustness Against Backdoor Attackscited by 115
9 more
  1. 2020MetaPoison: Practical General-purpose Clean-label Data Poisoningcited by 114
  2. 2020Just How Toxic is Data Poisoning? A Unified Benchmark for Backdoor and Data Poisoning Attackscited by 109
  3. 2020Strong Data Augmentation Sanitizes Poisoning and Backdoor Attacks Without an Accuracy Tradeoffcited by 86
  4. 2019Learning to Confuse: Generating Training Time Adversarial Data with Auto-Encodercited by 70
  5. 2020Bullseye Polytope: A Scalable Clean-Label Poisoning Attack with Improved Transferabilitycited by 65
  6. 2021Better Safe Than Sorry: Preventing Delusive Adversaries with Adversarial Trainingcited by 58
  7. 2020On Adversarial Bias and the Robustness of Fair Machine Learningcited by 36
  8. 2021DP-InstaHide: Provably Defusing Poisoning and Backdoor Attacks with Differentially Private Data Augmentationscited by 33
  9. 2021Poisoning Attacks on Fair Machine Learningcited by 19

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.