Make Deep Networks Shallow Again
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Deep neural networks have a good success record and are thus viewed as the best architecture choice for complex applications. Their main shortcoming has been, for a long time, the vanishing gradient which prevented the numerical optimization algorithms from acceptable convergence. A breakthrough has been achieved by the concept of residual connections -- an identity mapping parallel to a conventional layer. This concept is applicable to stacks of layers of the same dimension and substantially alleviates the vanishing gradient problem. A stack of residual connection layers can be expressed as an expansion of terms similar to the Taylor expansion. This expansion suggests the possibility of truncating the higher-order terms and receiving an architecture consisting of a single broad layer composed of all initially stacked layers in parallel. In other words, a sequential deep architecture is substituted by a parallel shallow one. Prompted by this theory, we investigated the performance capabilities of the parallel architecture in comparison to the sequential one. The computer vision datasets MNIST and CIFAR10 were used to train both architectures for a total of 6912 combinations of varying numbers of convolutional layers, numbers of filters, kernel sizes, and other meta parameters. Our findings demonstrate a surprising equivalence between the deep (sequential) and shallow (parallel) architectures. Both layouts produced similar results in terms of training and validation set loss. This discovery implies that a wide, shallow architecture can potentially replace a deep network without sacrificing performance. Such substitution has the potential to simplify network architectures, improve optimization efficiency, and accelerate the training process.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 15 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Sep 2023.
Builds on
7 of 15 references.
References · 7
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,267
- 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,441
- 2019EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 6,415
- 2015Training Very Deep Networkscited by 172
- 2022Efficient shallow learning as an alternative to deep learningcited by 6
- 2022Number of Attention Heads vs Number of Transformer-Encoders in Computer Visioncited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.