mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Encoded Summarization: Summarizing Documents into Continuous Vector Space for Legal Case Retrieval

arXiv 2309.08187 ↗First posted 15 Sep 2023cs.CLcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We present our method for tackling a legal case retrieval task by introducing our method of encoding documents by summarizing them into continuous vector space via our phrase scoring framework utilizing deep neural networks. On the other hand, we explore the benefits from combining lexical features and latent features generated with neural networks. Our experiments show that lexical features and latent features generated with neural networks complement each other to improve the retrieval system performance. Furthermore, our experimental results suggest the importance of case summarization in different aspects: using provided summaries and performing encoded summarization. Our approach achieved F1 of 65.6% and 57.6% on the experimental datasets of legal case retrieval tasks.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Sep 2023.

Builds on

7 of 33 references.

References · 7

  1. 2013Distributed Representations of Words and Phrases and their Compositionalitycited by 3,462
  2. 2014Convolutional Neural Networks for Sentence Classificationcited by 1,124
  3. 2014Distributed Representations of Sentences and Documentscited by 677
  4. 2016Enhanced LSTM for Natural Language Inferencecited by 199
  5. 2014A Convolutional Neural Network for Modelling Sentencescited by 163
  6. 2014Effective Use of Word Order for Text Categorization with Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 39
  7. 2018Automatic Catchphrase Extraction from Legal Case Documents via Scoring using Deep Neural Networkscited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 1; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.

6 papers.