Supervised Stochastic Neighbor Embedding Using Contrastive Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Stochastic neighbor embedding (SNE) methods t-SNE, UMAP are two most popular dimensionality reduction methods for data visualization. Contrastive learning, especially self-supervised contrastive learning (SSCL), has showed great success in embedding features from unlabeled data. The conceptual connection between SNE and SSCL has been exploited. In this work, within the scope of preserving neighboring information of a dataset, we extend the self-supervised contrastive approach to the fully-supervised setting, allowing us to effectively leverage label information. Clusters of samples belonging to the same class are pulled together in low-dimensional embedding space, while simultaneously pushing apart clusters of samples from different classes.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 15 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Sep 2023.
Builds on
11 of 15 references.
References · 11
- 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 11,979
- 2018Representation Learning with Contrastive Predictive Codingcited by 7,662
- 2018UMAP: Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection for Dimension Reductioncited by 2,841
- 2020Supervised Contrastive Learningcited by 2,803
- 2020Big Self-Supervised Models are Strong Semi-Supervised Learnerscited by 1,375
- 2020Understanding How Dimension Reduction Tools Work: An Empirical Approach to Deciphering t-SNE, UMAP, TriMAP, and PaCMAP for Data Visualizationcited by 170
- 2020Parametric UMAP embeddings for representation and semi-supervised learningcited by 103
- 2019TriMap: Large-scale Dimensionality Reduction Using Tripletscited by 59
- 2020Attraction-Repulsion Spectrum in Neighbor Embeddingscited by 41
- 2021On UMAP's true loss functioncited by 32
- 2022From t-SNE to UMAP with contrastive learningcited by 28
Built on by
Not cited yet.