Identifying the Group-Theoretic Structure of Machine-Learned Symmetries
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Deep learning was recently successfully used in deriving symmetry transformations that preserve important physics quantities. Being completely agnostic, these techniques postpone the identification of the discovered symmetries to a later stage. In this letter we propose methods for examining and identifying the group-theoretic structure of such machine-learned symmetries. We design loss functions which probe the subalgebra structure either during the deep learning stage of symmetry discovery or in a subsequent post-processing stage. We illustrate the new methods with examples from the U(n) Lie group family, obtaining the respective subalgebra decompositions. As an application to particle physics, we demonstrate the identification of the residual symmetries after the spontaneous breaking of non-Abelian gauge symmetries like SU(3) and SU(5) which are commonly used in model building.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Sep 2023.
Builds on
12 of 38 references.
References · 12
- 2018Discovering physical concepts with neural networkscited by 117
- 2020AI Poincar'e: Machine Learning Conservation Laws from Trajectoriescited by 77
- 2020Detecting Symmetries with Neural Networkscited by 34
- 2020Discovering Symmetry Invariants and Conserved Quantities by Interpreting Siamese Neural Networkscited by 33
- 2021Machine-learning hidden symmetriescited by 31
- 2022LieGG: Studying Learned Lie Group Generatorscited by 31
- 2023Deep Learning Symmetries and Their Lie Groups, Algebras, and Subalgebras from First Principlescited by 22
- 2021Symmetry meets AIcited by 13
- 2021Machine learning a manifoldcited by 9
- 2023Discovering Sparse Representations of Lie Groups with Machine Learningcited by 8
- 2023Accelerated Discovery of Machine-Learned Symmetries: Deriving the Exceptional Lie Groups G2, F4 and E6cited by 6
- 2023Oracle-Preserving Latent Flowscited by 5
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 3; 2025: 2.
6 papers.
- 2025Interpretable Machine Learning in Physics: A Reviewcited by 14
- 2023A Comparison Between Invariant and Equivariant Classical and Quantum Graph Neural Networkscited by 6
- 2024Lorentz-Equivariant Quantum Graph Neural Network for High-Energy Physicscited by 4
- 2024Quantum Rationale-Aware Graph Contrastive Learning for Jet Discriminationcited by 0
- 2024Lie-Equivariant Quantum Graph Neural Networkscited by 0
- 2025Non-Gaussianities in Collider Metric Binningcited by 0
- 2025Interpretable Machine Learning in Physics: A Review30 Mar 2025
- 2025Non-Gaussianities in Collider Metric Binning5 Mar 2025
- 2024Lie-Equivariant Quantum Graph Neural Networks22 Nov 2024
- 2024Quantum Rationale-Aware Graph Contrastive Learning for Jet Discrimination3 Nov 2024
- 2024Lorentz-Equivariant Quantum Graph Neural Network for High-Energy Physics3 Nov 2024
- 2023A Comparison Between Invariant and Equivariant Classical and Quantum Graph Neural Networks30 Nov 2023