mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Scaled Prompt-Tuning for Few-Shot Natural Language Generation

arXiv 2309.06759 ↗First posted 13 Sep 2023cs.CLcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The increasingly Large Language Models (LLMs) demonstrate stronger language understanding and generation capabilities, while the memory demand and computation cost of fine-tuning LLMs on downstream tasks are non-negligible. Besides, fine-tuning generally requires a certain amount of data from individual tasks whilst data collection cost is another issue to consider in real-world applications. In this work, we focus on Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning (PEFT) methods for few-shot Natural Language Generation (NLG), which freeze most parameters in LLMs and tune a small subset of parameters in few-shot cases so that memory footprint, training cost, and labeling cost are reduced while maintaining or even improving the performance. We propose a Scaled Prompt-Tuning (SPT) method which surpasses conventional PT with better performance and generalization ability but without an obvious increase in training cost. Further study on intermediate SPT suggests the superior transferability of SPT in few-shot scenarios, providing a recipe for data-deficient and computation-limited circumstances. Moreover, a comprehensive comparison of existing PEFT methods reveals that certain approaches exhibiting decent performance with modest training cost such as Prefix-Tuning in prior study could struggle in few-shot NLG tasks, especially on challenging datasets.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 22 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Sep 2023.

Builds on

22 of 22 references.

References · 22

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  2. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  3. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,599
  4. 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,380
  5. 2019BART: Denoising Sequence-to-Sequence Pre-training for Natural Language Generation, Translation, and Comprehensioncited by 5,893
  6. 2018GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Natural Language Understandingcited by 4,899
  7. 2019Parameter-Efficient Transfer Learning for NLPcited by 4,236
  8. 2021Prefix-Tuning: Optimizing Continuous Prompts for Generationcited by 3,915
  9. 2021The Power of Scale for Parameter-Efficient Prompt Tuningcited by 3,795
  10. 2021Multitask Prompted Training Enables Zero-Shot Task Generalizationcited by 1,470
  11. 2021BitFit: Simple Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning for Transformer-based Masked Language-modelscited by 1,245
  12. 2022Few-Shot Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning is Better and Cheaper than In-Context Learningcited by 896
10 more
  1. 2021Towards a Unified View of Parameter-Efficient Transfer Learningcited by 872
  2. 2020AdapterFusion: Non-Destructive Task Composition for Transfer Learningcited by 788
  3. 2021P-Tuning v2: Prompt Tuning Can Be Comparable to Fine-tuning Universally Across Scales and Taskscited by 689
  4. 2020Intrinsic Dimensionality Explains the Effectiveness of Language Model Fine-Tuningcited by 671
  5. 2021Compacter: Efficient Low-Rank Hypercomplex Adapter Layerscited by 460
  6. 2021Factual Probing Is [MASK]: Learning vs. Learning to Recallcited by 291
  7. 2020AdapterDrop: On the Efficiency of Adapters in Transformerscited by 224
  8. 2021WARP: Word-level Adversarial ReProgrammingcited by 221
  9. 2021Training Neural Networks with Fixed Sparse Maskscited by 214
  10. 2021UniPELT: A Unified Framework for Parameter-Efficient Language Model Tuningcited by 162

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

2 papers.