mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Generalizable Neural Fields as Partially Observed Neural Processes

arXiv 2309.06660 ↗First posted 13 Sep 2023cs.LG cs.CVcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Neural fields, which represent signals as a function parameterized by a neural network, are a promising alternative to traditional discrete vector or grid-based representations. Compared to discrete representations, neural representations both scale well with increasing resolution, are continuous, and can be many-times differentiable. However, given a dataset of signals that we would like to represent, having to optimize a separate neural field for each signal is inefficient, and cannot capitalize on shared information or structures among signals. Existing generalization methods view this as a meta-learning problem and employ gradient-based meta-learning to learn an initialization which is then fine-tuned with test-time optimization, or learn hypernetworks to produce the weights of a neural field. We instead propose a new paradigm that views the large-scale training of neural representations as a part of a partially-observed neural process framework, and leverage neural process algorithms to solve this task. We demonstrate that this approach outperforms both state-of-the-art gradient-based meta-learning approaches and hypernetwork approaches.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 30 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Sep 2023.

Builds on

30 of 35 references.

References · 30

  1. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
  2. 2017Model-Agnostic Meta-Learning for Fast Adaptation of Deep Networkscited by 4,897
  3. 2014Deep Learning Face Attributes in the Wildcited by 3,693
  4. 2015ShapeNet: An Information-Rich 3D Model Repositorycited by 2,897
  5. 2019DeepSDF: Learning Continuous Signed Distance Functions for Shape Representationcited by 2,689
  6. 2020Implicit Neural Representations with Periodic Activation Functionscited by 2,238
  7. 2018Occupancy Networks: Learning 3D Reconstruction in Function Spacecited by 2,041
  8. 2018Learning Implicit Fields for Generative Shape Modelingcited by 1,060
  9. 2016HyperNetworkscited by 1,027
  10. 2018On First-Order Meta-Learning Algorithmscited by 1,018
  11. 2019Scene Representation Networks: Continuous 3D-Structure-Aware Neural Scene Representationscited by 864
  12. 2020Convolutional Occupancy Networkscited by 761
18 more
  1. 2021Neural Fields in Visual Computing and Beyondcited by 540
  2. 2018Conditional Neural Processescited by 426
  3. 2019SAL: Sign Agnostic Learning of Shapes from Raw Datacited by 390
  4. 2021Light Field Networks: Neural Scene Representations with Single-Evaluation Renderingcited by 332
  5. 2018Neural Processescited by 311
  6. 2019Attentive Neural Processescited by 283
  7. 2019Learning Shape Templates with Structured Implicit Functionscited by 242
  8. 2020Learned Initializations for Optimizing Coordinate-Based Neural Representationscited by 242
  9. 2020MetaSDF: Meta-learning Signed Distance Functionscited by 214
  10. 2019Convolutional Conditional Neural Processescited by 142
  11. 2021Modulated Periodic Activations for Generalizable Local Functional Representationscited by 140
  12. 2021Stylizing 3D Scene via Implicit Representation and HyperNetworkcited by 103
  13. 2022Transformers as Meta-Learners for Implicit Neural Representationscited by 79
  14. 2020Meta-Learning Stationary Stochastic Process Prediction with Convolutional Neural Processescited by 76
  15. 2020HyperSeg: Patch-wise Hypernetwork for Real-time Semantic Segmentationcited by 66
  16. 2021Meta-Learning Sparse Implicit Neural Representationscited by 48
  17. 2022What Matters For Meta-Learning Vision Regression Tasks?cited by 18
  18. 2023Versatile Neural Processes for Learning Implicit Neural Representationscited by 11

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 4; 2026: 2.

7 papers.