Expressive dynamics models with nonlinear injective readouts enable reliable recovery of latent features from neural activity
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The advent of large-scale neural recordings has enabled new methods to discover the computational mechanisms of neural circuits by understanding the rules that govern how their state evolves over time. While these textitneural dynamics cannot be directly measured, they can typically be approximated by low-dimensional models in a latent space. How these models represent the mapping from latent space to neural space can affect the interpretability of the latent representation. We show that typical choices for this mapping (e.g., linear or MLP) often lack the property of injectivity, meaning that changes in latent state are not obligated to affect activity in the neural space. During training, non-injective readouts incentivize the invention of dynamics that misrepresent the underlying system and the computation it performs. Combining our injective Flow readout with prior work on interpretable latent dynamics models, we created the Ordinary Differential equations autoencoder with Injective Nonlinear readout (ODIN), which captures latent dynamical systems that are nonlinearly embedded into observed neural activity via an approximately injective nonlinear mapping. We show that ODIN can recover nonlinearly embedded systems from simulated neural activity, even when the nature of the system and embedding are unknown. Additionally, ODIN enables the unsupervised recovery of underlying dynamical features (e.g., fixed points) and embedding geometry. When applied to biological neural recordings, ODIN can reconstruct neural activity with comparable accuracy to previous state-of-the-art methods while using substantially fewer latent dimensions. Overall, ODIN's accuracy in recovering ground-truth latent features and ability to accurately reconstruct neural activity with low dimensionality make it a promising method for distilling interpretable dynamics that can help explain neural computation.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 12 Sep 2023.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 5; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.
6 papers.
- 2024Inferring stochastic low-rank recurrent neural networks from neural datacited by 15
- 2024Modeling Latent Neural Dynamics with Gaussian Process Switching Linear Dynamical Systemscited by 11
- 2024Generative Modeling of Neural Dynamics via Latent Stochastic Differential Equationscited by 4
- 2024Diffusion-Based Generation of Neural Activity from Disentangled Latent Codescited by 1
- 2024When predict can also explain: few-shot prediction to select better neural latentscited by 0
- 2026Machine Learning Methods for Studying Latent Neural Activity Dynamicscited by 0
- 2026Machine Learning Methods for Studying Latent Neural Activity Dynamics9 Jun 2026
- 2024Generative Modeling of Neural Dynamics via Latent Stochastic Differential Equations1 Dec 2024
- 2024Diffusion-Based Generation of Neural Activity from Disentangled Latent Codes30 Jul 2024
- 2024Modeling Latent Neural Dynamics with Gaussian Process Switching Linear Dynamical Systems19 Jul 2024
- 2024Inferring stochastic low-rank recurrent neural networks from neural data24 Jun 2024
- 2024When predict can also explain: few-shot prediction to select better neural latents23 May 2024