mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

SortedAP: Rethinking evaluation metrics for instance segmentation

arXiv 2309.04887 ↗First posted 9 Sep 2023cs.CVcited by 8

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Designing metrics for evaluating instance segmentation revolves around comprehensively considering object detection and segmentation accuracy. However, other important properties, such as sensitivity, continuity, and equality, are overlooked in the current study. In this paper, we reveal that most existing metrics have a limited resolution of segmentation quality. They are only conditionally sensitive to the change of masks or false predictions. For certain metrics, the score can change drastically in a narrow range which could provide a misleading indication of the quality gap between results. Therefore, we propose a new metric called sortedAP, which strictly decreases with both object- and pixel-level imperfections and has an uninterrupted penalization scale over the entire domain. We provide the evaluation toolkit and experiment code at https://www.github.com/looooongChen/sortedAP.

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 19 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Sep 2023.

Builds on

8 of 19 references.

References · 8

  1. 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,498
  2. 2017Mask R-CNNcited by 7,259
  3. 2018Panoptic Segmentationcited by 796
  4. 2019TensorMask: A Foundation for Dense Object Segmentationcited by 101
  5. 2018Localization Recall Precision (LRP): A New Performance Metric for Object Detectioncited by 31
  6. 2022Beyond mAP: Towards better evaluation of instance segmentationcited by 6
  7. 2022Instance Segmentation of Dense and Overlapping Objects via Layeringcited by 5
  8. 2021High-throughput Phenotyping of Nematode Cystscited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 2; 2025: 2; 2026: 2.

8 papers.