Weighted Unsupervised Domain Adaptation Considering Geometry Features and Engineering Performance of 3D Design Data
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The product design process in manufacturing involves iterative design modeling and analysis to achieve the target engineering performance, but such an iterative process is time consuming and computationally expensive. Recently, deep learning-based engineering performance prediction models have been proposed to accelerate design optimization. However, they only guarantee predictions on training data and may be inaccurate when applied to new domain data. In particular, 3D design data have complex features, which means domains with various distributions exist. Thus, the utilization of deep learning has limitations due to the heavy data collection and training burdens. We propose a bi-weighted unsupervised domain adaptation approach that considers the geometry features and engineering performance of 3D design data. It is specialized for deep learning-based engineering performance predictions. Domain-invariant features can be extracted through an adversarial training strategy by using hypothesis discrepancy, and a multi-output regression task can be performed with the extracted features to predict the engineering performance. In particular, we present a source instance weighting method suitable for 3D design data to avoid negative transfers. The developed bi-weighting strategy based on the geometry features and engineering performance of engineering structures is incorporated into the training process. The proposed model is tested on a wheel impact analysis problem to predict the magnitude of the maximum von Mises stress and the corresponding location of 3D road wheels. This mechanism can reduce the target risk for unlabeled target domains on the basis of weighted multi-source domain knowledge and can efficiently replace conventional finite element analysis.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Sep 2023.
Builds on
18 of 39 references.
References · 18
- 2022Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 5,603
- 2015Domain-Adversarial Training of Neural Networkscited by 3,023
- 2018Moment Matching for Multi-Source Domain Adaptationcited by 1,327
- 2017Adversarial Discriminative Domain Adaptationcited by 1,309
- 2020Meta-Learning in Neural Networks: A Surveycited by 944
- 2019Generalizing from a Few Examples: A Survey on Few-Shot Learningcited by 462
- 2018A Survey of Unsupervised Deep Domain Adaptationcited by 361
- 2020A Brief Review of Domain Adaptationcited by 287
- 2021Weakly Supervised Object Localization and Detection: A Surveycited by 84
- 2021A Survey on Deep Domain Adaptation for LiDAR Perceptioncited by 46
- 2021Source-Free Domain Adaptation for Image Segmentationcited by 45
- 2021Regressive Domain Adaptation for Unsupervised Keypoint Detectioncited by 34
6 more
- 2018Stress Field Prediction in Cantilevered Structures Using Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 25
- 2020Integrating Deep Learning into CAD/CAE System: Generative Design and Evaluation of 3D Conceptual Wheelcited by 25
- 2021Deep Metric Learning for Few-Shot Image Classification: A Review of Recent Developmentscited by 23
- 2020Adversarial Weighting for Domain Adaptation in Regressioncited by 19
- 2018M-ADDA: Unsupervised Domain Adaptation with Deep Metric Learningcited by 8
- 2022Wheel Impact Test by Deep Learning: Prediction of Location and Magnitude of Maximum Stresscited by 5
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.