mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Sparse-DFT and WHT Precoding with Iterative Detection for Highly Frequency-Selective Channels

arXiv 2309.04149 ↗First posted 8 Sep 2023cs.IT eess.SP math.ITcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Various precoders have been recently studied by the wireless community to combat the channel fading effects. Two prominent precoders are implemented with the discrete Fourier transform (DFT) and Walsh-Hadamard transform (WHT). The WHT precoder is implemented with less complexity since it does not need complex multiplications. Also, spreading can be applied sparsely to decrease the transceiver complexity, leading to sparse DFT (SDFT) and sparse Walsh-Hadamard (SWH). Another relevant topic is the design of iterative receivers that deal with inter-symbol-interference (ISI). In particular, many detectors based on expectation propagation (EP) have been proposed recently for channels with high levels of ISI. An alternative is the maximum a-posterior (MAP) detector, although it leads to unfeasible high complexity in many cases. In this paper, we provide a relatively low-complexity textcolorblackcomputation of the MAP detector for the SWH. We also propose two textcolorblackfeasible methods based on the Log-MAP and Max-Log-MAP. Additionally, the DFT, SDFT and SWH precoders are compared using an EP-based receiver with one-tap FD equalization. Lastly, SWH-Max-Log-MAP is compared to the (S)DFT with EP-based receiver in terms of performance and complexity. The results show that the proposed SWH-Max-Log-MAP has a better performance and complexity trade-off for QPSK and 16-QAM under highly selective channels, but has unfeasible complexity for higher QAM orders.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 8 Sep 2023.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.

  1. 2025Random Multiplexingcited by 1