Automatic Concept Embedding Model (ACEM): No train-time concepts, No issue!
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Interpretability and explainability of neural networks is continuously increasing in importance, especially within safety-critical domains and to provide the social right to explanation. Concept based explanations align well with how humans reason, proving to be a good way to explain models. Concept Embedding Models (CEMs) are one such concept based explanation architectures. These have shown to overcome the trade-off between explainability and performance. However, they have a key limitation -- they require concept annotations for all their training data. For large datasets, this can be expensive and infeasible. Motivated by this, we propose Automatic Concept Embedding Models (ACEMs), which learn the concept annotations automatically.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Sep 2023.
Builds on
11 of 31 references.
References · 11
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
- 2018The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Deep Features as a Perceptual Metriccited by 11,177
- 2014Going Deeper with Convolutionscited by 4,241
- 2017Interpretability Beyond Feature Attribution: Quantitative Testing with Concept Activation Vectors (TCAV)cited by 1,319
- 2018Sanity Checks for Saliency Mapscited by 1,156
- 2020Concept Bottleneck Modelscited by 1,032
- 2017Interpretation of Neural Networks is Fragilecited by 444
- 2023Label-Free Concept Bottleneck Modelscited by 285
- 2018Manipulating and Measuring Model Interpretabilitycited by 256
- 2021Logic Explained Networkscited by 45
- 2018Knockoffs for the mass: new feature importance statistics with false discovery guaranteescited by 11
Built on by
Not cited yet.