mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Medoid Silhouette clustering with automatic cluster number selection

arXiv 2309.03751 ↗First posted 7 Sep 2023cs.LG stat.MLcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The evaluation of clustering results is difficult, highly dependent on the evaluated data set and the perspective of the beholder. There are many different clustering quality measures, which try to provide a general measure to validate clustering results. A very popular measure is the Silhouette. We discuss the efficient medoid-based variant of the Silhouette, perform a theoretical analysis of its properties, provide two fast versions for the direct optimization, and discuss the use to choose the optimal number of clusters. We combine ideas from the original Silhouette with the well-known PAM algorithm and its latest improvements FasterPAM. One of the versions guarantees equal results to the original variant and provides a run speedup of O(k2). In experiments on real data with 30000 samples and k=100, we observed a 10464× speedup compared to the original PAMMEDSIL algorithm. Additionally, we provide a variant to choose the optimal number of clusters directly.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 3 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Sep 2023.

Builds on

3 of 29 references.

References · 3

  1. 2018Faster k-Medoids Clustering: Improving the PAM, CLARA, and CLARANS Algorithmscited by 44
  2. 2020Fast and Eager k-Medoids Clustering: O(k) Runtime Improvement of the PAM, CLARA, and CLARANS Algorithmscited by 35
  3. 2022Stop using the elbow criterion for k-means and how to choose the number of clusters insteadcited by 25

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 3; 2026: 1.

5 papers.