Evaluating Deep Learning-based Melanoma Classification using Immunohistochemistry and Routine Histology: A Three Center Study
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Pathologists routinely use immunohistochemical (IHC)-stained tissue slides against MelanA in addition to hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained slides to improve their accuracy in diagnosing melanomas. The use of diagnostic Deep Learning (DL)-based support systems for automated examination of tissue morphology and cellular composition has been well studied in standard H&E-stained tissue slides. In contrast, there are few studies that analyze IHC slides using DL. Therefore, we investigated the separate and joint performance of ResNets trained on MelanA and corresponding H&E-stained slides. The MelanA classifier achieved an area under receiver operating characteristics curve (AUROC) of 0.82 and 0.74 on out of distribution (OOD)-datasets, similar to the H&E-based benchmark classification of 0.81 and 0.75, respectively. A combined classifier using MelanA and H&E achieved AUROCs of 0.85 and 0.81 on the OOD datasets. DL MelanA-based assistance systems show the same performance as the benchmark H&E classification and may be improved by multi stain classification to assist pathologists in their clinical routine.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 5 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Sep 2023.
Builds on
5 of 39 references.
References · 5
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
- 2019Optuna: A Next-generation Hyperparameter Optimization Frameworkcited by 2,501
- 2019Quantifying the effects of data augmentation and stain color normalization in convolutional neural networks for computational pathologycited by 173
- 2023Dermatologist-like explainable AI enhances trust and confidence in diagnosing melanomacited by 18
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1.
1 paper.