mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

An Offline Learning Approach to Propagator Models

arXiv 2309.02994 ↗First posted 6 Sep 2023math.OC math.PR q-fin.STcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We consider an offline learning problem for an agent who first estimates an unknown price impact kernel from a static dataset, and then designs strategies to liquidate a risky asset while creating transient price impact. We propose a novel approach for a nonparametric estimation of the propagator from a dataset containing correlated price trajectories, trading signals and metaorders. We quantify the accuracy of the estimated propagator using a metric which depends explicitly on the dataset. We show that a trader who tries to minimise her execution costs by using a greedy strategy purely based on the estimated propagator will encounter suboptimality due to so-called spurious correlation between the trading strategy and the estimator and due to intrinsic uncertainty resulting from a biased cost functional. By adopting an offline reinforcement learning approach, we introduce a pessimistic loss functional taking the uncertainty of the estimated propagator into account, with an optimiser which eliminates the spurious correlation, and derive an asymptotically optimal bound on the execution costs even without precise information on the true propagator. Numerical experiments are included to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed propagator estimator and the pessimistic trading strategy.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Sep 2023.

Builds on

7 of 41 references.

References · 7

  1. 2016CVXPY: A Python-Embedded Modeling Language for Convex Optimizationcited by 641
  2. 2020MOReL : Model-Based Offline Reinforcement Learningcited by 590
  3. 2020Is Pessimism Provably Efficient for Offline RL?cited by 364
  4. 2021Pessimistic Model-based Offline Reinforcement Learning under Partial Coveragecited by 164
  5. 2021Dealing with the Unknown: Pessimistic Offline Reinforcement Learningcited by 19
  6. 2023Statistical Learning with Sublinear Regret of Propagator Modelscited by 5
  7. 2023Equilibrium in Functional Stochastic Games with Mean-Field Interactioncited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 1.

2 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Can Reinforcement Learning Efficiently Discover Price Manipulation?
  2. 2025Diverse Transformer Decoding for Offline Reinforcement Learning Using Financial Algorithmic Approaches
  3. 2026Realistic Market Impact Modeling for Reinforcement Learning Trading Environments
  4. 2024A Tale of Two Cities: Pessimism and Opportunism in Offline Dynamic Pricing
  5. 2025Your Offline Policy is Not Trustworthy: Bilevel Reinforcement Learning for Sequential Portfolio Optimization
  6. 2023Towards Generalizable Reinforcement Learning for Trade Execution
  7. 2025Right Place, Right Time: Market Simulation-based RL for Execution Optimisation
  8. 2026Trading Confidence: Comprehensive Uncertainty Estimation in Algorithmic Trading