mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Adaptive Consensus: A network pruning approach for decentralized optimization

arXiv 2309.02626 ↗First posted 6 Sep 2023math.OC stat.MLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We consider network-based decentralized optimization problems, where each node in the network possesses a local function and the objective is to collectively attain a consensus solution that minimizes the sum of all the local functions. A major challenge in decentralized optimization is the reliance on communication which remains a considerable bottleneck in many applications. To address this challenge, we propose an adaptive randomized communication-efficient algorithmic framework that reduces the volume of communication by periodically tracking the disagreement error and judiciously selecting the most influential and effective edges at each node for communication. Within this framework, we present two algorithms: Adaptive Consensus (AC) to solve the consensus problem and Adaptive Consensus based Gradient Tracking (AC-GT) to solve smooth strongly convex decentralized optimization problems. We establish strong theoretical convergence guarantees for the proposed algorithms and quantify their performance in terms of various algorithmic parameters under standard assumptions. Finally, numerical experiments showcase the effectiveness of the framework in significantly reducing the information exchange required to achieve a consensus solution.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 59 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Sep 2023.

Builds on

20 of 59 references.

References · 20

  1. 2018The Lottery Ticket Hypothesis: Finding Sparse, Trainable Neural Networkscited by 2,250
  2. 2016CVXPY: A Python-Embedded Modeling Language for Convex Optimizationcited by 633
  3. 2020Proving the Lottery Ticket Hypothesis: Pruning is All You Needcited by 200
  4. 2014EXTRA: An Exact First-Order Algorithm for Decentralized Consensus Optimizationcited by 160
  5. 2016Achieving Geometric Convergence for Distributed Optimization over Time-Varying Graphscited by 149
  6. 2016NEXT: In-Network Nonconvex Optimizationcited by 107
  7. 2022An Improved Analysis of Gradient Tracking for Decentralized Machine Learningcited by 68
  8. 2018Push-Pull Gradient Methods for Distributed Optimization in Networkscited by 45
  9. 2017Communication-Efficient Algorithms for Decentralized and Stochastic Optimizationcited by 42
  10. 2018An Exact Quantized Decentralized Gradient Descent Algorithmcited by 34
  11. 2017Balancing Communication and Computation in Distributed Optimizationcited by 23
  12. 2017Data-Efficient Decentralized Visual SLAMcited by 23
8 more
  1. 2018Asynchronous Gradient-Pushcited by 20
  2. 2015A Unified Algorithmic Framework for Block-Structured Optimization Involving Big Datacited by 15
  3. 2015Communication-Efficient Distributed Optimization of Self-Concordant Empirical Losscited by 7
  4. 2020On the Convergence of Nested Decentralized Gradient Methods with Multiple Consensus and Gradient Stepscited by 5
  5. 2023Balancing Communication and Computation in Gradient Tracking Algorithms for Decentralized Optimizationcited by 5
  6. 2019Nested Distributed Gradient Methods with Adaptive Quantized Communicationcited by 3
  7. 2022Maximal Dissent: a State-Dependent Way to Agree in Distributed Convex Optimizationcited by 3
  8. 2023A Stochastic Gradient Tracking Algorithm for Decentralized Optimization With Inexact Communicationcited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.