mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Automating Behavioral Testing in Machine Translation

arXiv 2309.02553 ↗First posted 5 Sep 2023cs.CL cs.AIcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Behavioral testing in NLP allows fine-grained evaluation of systems by examining their linguistic capabilities through the analysis of input-output behavior. Unfortunately, existing work on behavioral testing in Machine Translation (MT) is currently restricted to largely handcrafted tests covering a limited range of capabilities and languages. To address this limitation, we propose to use Large Language Models (LLMs) to generate a diverse set of source sentences tailored to test the behavior of MT models in a range of situations. We can then verify whether the MT model exhibits the expected behavior through matching candidate sets that are also generated using LLMs. Our approach aims to make behavioral testing of MT systems practical while requiring only minimal human effort. In our experiments, we apply our proposed evaluation framework to assess multiple available MT systems, revealing that while in general pass-rates follow the trends observable from traditional accuracy-based metrics, our method was able to uncover several important differences and potential bugs that go unnoticed when relying only on accuracy.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Sep 2023.

Builds on

20 of 37 references.

References · 20

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  2. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
  3. 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,170
  4. 2021Finetuned Language Models Are Zero-Shot Learnerscited by 3,780
  5. 2023G-Eval: NLG Evaluation using GPT-4 with Better Human Alignmentcited by 2,276
  6. 2018A Call for Clarity in Reporting BLEU Scorescited by 1,799
  7. 2022No Language Left Behind: Scaling Human-Centered Machine Translationcited by 1,312
  8. 2015A Diversity-Promoting Objective Function for Neural Conversation Modelscited by 1,077
  9. 2020COMET: A Neural Framework for MT Evaluationcited by 1,033
  10. 2020Beyond Accuracy: Behavioral Testing of NLP models with CheckListcited by 1,006
  11. 2021BARTScore: Evaluating Generated Text as Text Generationcited by 722
  12. 2020Making Monolingual Sentence Embeddings Multilingual using Knowledge Distillationcited by 593
8 more
  1. 2020Beyond English-Centric Multilingual Machine Translationcited by 561
  2. 2023Large Language Models Are State-of-the-Art Evaluators of Translation Qualitycited by 420
  3. 2017Synthetic and Natural Noise Both Break Neural Machine Translationcited by 306
  4. 2022Towards a Unified Multi-Dimensional Evaluator for Text Generationcited by 264
  5. 2021Facebook AI WMT21 News Translation Task Submissioncited by 57
  6. 2022Can Transformer be Too Compositional? Analysing Idiom Processing in Neural Machine Translationcited by 28
  7. 2022SALTED: A Framework for SAlient Long-Tail Translation Error Detectioncited by 23
  8. 2021As Easy as 1, 2, 3: Behavioural Testing of NMT Systems for Numerical Translationcited by 8

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2.

2 papers.