Characteristics of ChatGPT users from Germany: implications for the digital divide from web tracking data
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
A major challenge of our time is reducing disparities in access to and effective use of digital technologies, with recent discussions highlighting the role of AI in exacerbating the digital divide. We examine user characteristics that predict usage of the AI-powered conversational agent ChatGPT. We combine behavioral and survey data in a web tracked sample of N = 1376 German citizens to investigate differences in ChatGPT activity (usage, visits, and adoption) during the first 11 months from the launch of the service (November 30, 2022). Guided by a model of technology acceptance (UTAUT-2), we examine the role of socio-demographics commonly associated with the digital divide in ChatGPT activity and explore further socio-political attributes identified via stability selection in Lasso regressions. We confirm that lower age and higher education affect ChatGPT usage, but do not find that gender or income do. We find full-time employment and more children to be barriers to ChatGPT activity. Using a variety of social media was positively associated with ChatGPT activity. In terms of political variables, political knowledge and political self-efficacy as well as some political behaviors such as voting, debating political issues online and offline and political action online were all associated with ChatGPT activity, with online political debating and political self-efficacy negatively so. Finally, need for cognition and communication skills such as writing, attending meetings, or giving presentations, were also associated with ChatGPT engagement, though chairing/organizing meetings was negatively associated. Our research informs efforts to address digital disparities and promote digital literacy among underserved populations by presenting implications, recommendations, and discussions on ethical and social issues of our findings.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 5 Sep 2023.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 2.
4 papers.
- 2025The Accountability Paradox: How Platform API Restrictions Undermine AI Transparency Mandatescited by 7
- 2025Digital Companionship: Overlapping Uses of AI Companions and AI Assistantscited by 7
- 2026Consequential Behaviour and Representational Fairness in the Validation of Synthetic Researchcited by 1
- 2026How Early Adopters Used Generative AI Worldwide: Variation by Country Income and Languagecited by 0
- 2026Consequential Behaviour and Representational Fairness in the Validation of Synthetic Research23 Sep 2026
- 2026How Early Adopters Used Generative AI Worldwide: Variation by Country Income and Language29 May 2026
- 2025Digital Companionship: Overlapping Uses of AI Companions and AI Assistants16 Sep 2025
- 2025The Accountability Paradox: How Platform API Restrictions Undermine AI Transparency Mandates16 May 2025