Safe and Robust Watermark Injection with a Single OoD Image
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Training a high-performance deep neural network requires large amounts of data and computational resources. Protecting the intellectual property (IP) and commercial ownership of a deep model is challenging yet increasingly crucial. A major stream of watermarking strategies implants verifiable backdoor triggers by poisoning training samples, but these are often unrealistic due to data privacy and safety concerns and are vulnerable to minor model changes such as fine-tuning. To overcome these challenges, we propose a safe and robust backdoor-based watermark injection technique that leverages the diverse knowledge from a single out-of-distribution (OoD) image, which serves as a secret key for IP verification. The independence of training data makes it agnostic to third-party promises of IP security. We induce robustness via random perturbation of model parameters during watermark injection to defend against common watermark removal attacks, including fine-tuning, pruning, and model extraction. Our experimental results demonstrate that the proposed watermarking approach is not only time- and sample-efficient without training data, but also robust against the watermark removal attacks above.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 30 of its 47 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Sep 2023.
Builds on
30 of 47 references.
References · 30
- 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,592
- 2016Wide Residual Networkscited by 3,057
- 2016Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiencycited by 1,461
- 2020Energy-based Out-of-distribution Detectioncited by 1,296
- 2016Practical Black-Box Attacks against Machine Learningcited by 893
- 2016Stealing Machine Learning Models via Prediction APIscited by 602
- 2018Rethinking the Value of Network Pruningcited by 595
- 2017A Downsampled Variant of ImageNet as an Alternative to the CIFAR datasetscited by 374
- 2018Turning Your Weakness Into a Strength: Watermarking Deep Neural Networks by Backdooringcited by 334
- 2018Knockoff Nets: Stealing Functionality of Black-Box Modelscited by 285
- 2020Comparing Rewinding and Fine-tuning in Neural Network Pruningcited by 238
- 2017Embedding Watermarks into Deep Neural Networkscited by 227
18 more
- 2020Dataset Security for Machine Learning: Data Poisoning, Backdoor Attacks, and Defensescited by 171
- 2018PRADA: Protecting against DNN Model Stealing Attackscited by 159
- 2021Rethinking the Backdoor Attacks' Triggers: A Frequency Perspectivecited by 155
- 2020Entangled Watermarks as a Defense against Model Extractioncited by 144
- 2019TBT: Targeted Neural Network Attack with Bit Trojancited by 112
- 2017Adversarial Frontier Stitching for Remote Neural Network Watermarkingcited by 110
- 2019Data-Free Adversarial Distillationcited by 90
- 2019A critical analysis of self-supervision, or what we can learn from a single imagecited by 75
- 2021A survey of deep neural network watermarking techniquescited by 69
- 2020Can Adversarial Weight Perturbations Inject Neural Backdoors?cited by 51
- 2021Copy, Right? A Testing Framework for Copyright Protection of Deep Learning Modelscited by 44
- 2020ES Attack: Model Stealing against Deep Neural Networks without Data Hurdlescited by 24
- 2021You are caught stealing my winning lottery ticket! Making a lottery ticket claim its ownershipcited by 16
- 2022Free Fine-tuning: A Plug-and-Play Watermarking Scheme for Deep Neural Networkscited by 14
- 2022Trap and Replace: Defending Backdoor Attacks by Trapping Them into an Easy-to-Replace Subnetworkcited by 12
- 2023Sharpness-Aware Data Poisoning Attackcited by 9
- 2023Revisiting Data-Free Knowledge Distillation with Poisoned Teacherscited by 9
- 2022Knowledge-Free Black-Box Watermark and Ownership Proof for Image Classification Neural Networkscited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 3.
3 papers.