mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Classic algorithms are fair learners: Classification Analysis of natural weather and wildfire occurrences

arXiv 2309.01381 ↗First posted 4 Sep 2023cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Classic machine learning algorithms have been reviewed and studied mathematically on its performance and properties in detail. This paper intends to review the empirical functioning of widely used classical supervised learning algorithms such as Decision Trees, Boosting, Support Vector Machines, k-nearest Neighbors and a shallow Artificial Neural Network. The paper evaluates these algorithms on a sparse tabular data for classification task and observes the effect on specific hyperparameters on these algorithms when the data is synthetically modified for higher noise. These perturbations were introduced to observe these algorithms on their efficiency in generalizing for sparse data and their utility of different parameters to improve classification accuracy. The paper intends to show that these classic algorithms are fair learners even for such limited data due to their inherent properties even for noisy and sparse datasets.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 4 of its 20 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Sep 2023.

Builds on

4 of 20 references.

References · 4

  1. 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,166
  2. 2016Comparison of 14 different families of classification algorithms on 115 binary datasetscited by 6
  3. 2021Comparative Performance of Machine Learning Algorithms in Cyberbullying Detection: Using Turkish Language Preprocessing Techniquescited by 1
  4. 2022A study of tree-based methods and their combinationcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.