mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Discovering Predictive Relational Object Symbols with Symbolic Attentive Layers

arXiv 2309.00889 ↗First posted 2 Sep 2023cs.RO cs.LGcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In this paper, we propose and realize a new deep learning architecture for discovering symbolic representations for objects and their relations based on the self-supervised continuous interaction of a manipulator robot with multiple objects on a tabletop environment. The key feature of the model is that it can handle a changing number number of objects naturally and map the object-object relations into symbolic domain explicitly. In the model, we employ a self-attention layer that computes discrete attention weights from object features, which are treated as relational symbols between objects. These relational symbols are then used to aggregate the learned object symbols and predict the effects of executed actions on each object. The result is a pipeline that allows the formation of object symbols and relational symbols from a dataset of object features, actions, and effects in an end-to-end manner. We compare the performance of our proposed architecture with state-of-the-art symbol discovery methods in a simulated tabletop environment where the robot needs to discover symbols related to the relative positions of objects to predict the observed effect successfully. Our experiments show that the proposed architecture performs better than other baselines in effect prediction while forming not only object symbols but also relational symbols. Furthermore, we analyze the learned symbols and relational patterns between objects to learn about how the model interprets the environment. Our analysis shows that the learned symbols relate to the relative positions of objects, object types, and their horizontal alignment on the table, which reflect the regularities in the environment.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Sep 2023.

Builds on

20 of 40 references.

References · 20

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  3. 2016Categorical Reparameterization with Gumbel-Softmaxcited by 2,708
  4. 2016The Concrete Distribution: A Continuous Relaxation of Discrete Random Variablescited by 1,135
  5. 2015Prioritized Experience Replaycited by 1,070
  6. 2017Classical Planning in Deep Latent Space: Bridging the Subsymbolic-Symbolic Boundarycited by 58
  7. 2021Learning Symbolic Operators for Task and Motion Planningcited by 57
  8. 2022Learning Neuro-Symbolic Skills for Bilevel Planningcited by 55
  9. 2022Predicate Invention for Bilevel Planningcited by 49
  10. 2021Learning Neuro-Symbolic Relational Transition Models for Bilevel Planningcited by 43
  11. 2018Symbol Emergence in Cognitive Developmental Systems: a Surveycited by 39
  12. 2020Understanding the Power and Limitations of Teaching with Imperfect Knowledgecited by 23
8 more
  1. 2021Classical Planning in Deep Latent Spacecited by 21
  2. 2019Learning Portable Representations for High-Level Planningcited by 11
  3. 2022Planning for Multi-Object Manipulation with Graph Neural Network Relational Classifierscited by 11
  4. 2023Embodied Active Learning of Relational State Abstractions for Bilevel Planningcited by 8
  5. 2019Belief Regulated Dual Propagation Nets for Learning Action Effects on Groups of Articulated Objectscited by 5
  6. 2021Object and Relation Centric Representations for Push Effect Predictioncited by 5
  7. 2022Learning Temporally Extended Skills in Continuous Domains as Symbolic Actions for Planningcited by 3
  8. 2021High-level Features for Resource Economy and Fast Learning in Skill Transfercited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

3 papers.